Literature DB >> 11594853

Waiting times to see a dermatologist are perceived as too long by dermatologists: implications for the dermatology workforce.

T Suneja1, E D Smith, G J Chen, K J Zipperstein, A B Fleischer, S R Feldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The issue of workforce requirements in dermatology has come to attention in recent years because it affects the delivery of dermatologic care in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the waiting times for appointments with dermatologists in order to assess the adequacy of the current level of dermatology workforce.
METHODS: Waiting times were determined for new and return patient appointments by telephone survey of a random sample of American Academy of Dermatology members. Physicians' perception of the adequacy of the number of dermatologists in their area was used as a criterion standard to validate waiting times as a measure of workforce adequacy. Benchmark waiting times of 3 weeks for a new patient appointment and 2 weeks for a return appointment were established.
RESULTS: Physicians' estimates of the waiting time for a new patient appointment and their perceptions of the adequacy of the number of practicing dermatologists in their area were closely correlated (r = -0.65; P<.001), validating the use of waiting times as a measure of workforce adequacy. More than 60% of the dermatologists surveyed exceeded the criterion cutoff waiting times, and more than 42% of the US population lives in areas underserved by dermatologists. Dermatologists practicing in areas of higher population density were more likely to have shorter waiting times for new patient appointments and were more likely to include cosmetic dermatology in their practices.
CONCLUSION: The long waiting times for appointments suggests that the current supply of dermatologists is not adequate to meet the demand for dermatologists' services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11594853     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.137.10.1303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Juliana Berk-Krauss; Paula W Feng; Jennifer A Stein
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Nonphysician Practice of Cosmetic Dermatology: A Patient and Physician Perspective of Outcomes and Adverse Events.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Britney Wilson; Brian P Hibler; Lynn A Drake
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.398

3.  Total body photography for skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Lynn T Dengel; Gina R Petroni; Joshua Judge; David Chen; Scott T Acton; Anneke T Schroen; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.736

4.  Patient-centered online management of psoriasis: a randomized controlled equivalency trial.

Authors:  Cindy J Chambers; Kory K Parsi; Clayton Schupp; April W Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Teledermatology consultations provide specialty care for farmworkers in rural clinics.

Authors:  Quirina M Vallejos; Sara A Quandt; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer; Thanh Brooks; Gonzalo Cabral; Judy Heck; Mark R Schulz; Amit Verma; Lara E Whalley; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Time needed to schedule dermatological consultations in Brazil.

Authors:  Hélio Amante Miot; Luciane Donida Bartoli Miot
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.896

7.  Delayed access to health care and mortality.

Authors:  Julia C Prentice; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Melanoma prevention: are we doing enough? A Canadian perspective.

Authors:  A M Joshua
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  A Cross-Sectional Survey of Population-Wide Wait Times for Patients Seeking Medical vs. Cosmetic Dermatologic Care.

Authors:  Geeta Yadav; Hanna R Goldberg; Morgan D Barense; Chaim M Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Definitions, survey methods, and findings of patient satisfaction studies in teledermatology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward Hadeler; Howard Gitlow; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.