Literature DB >> 11593869

[Quality management in postoperative pain therapy].

W Meissner1, K Ullrich, S Zwacka, T Schreiber, K Reinhart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deficits in quality of postoperative pain management are not caused by the complexity of the medical problem or shortage of suitable drugs but by difficulties in organization and hospital structures. Moreover, there is no consensus on how to measure the quality of pain management. Quality management programs consist of strategies to overcome such difficulties and to increase quality continuously. This study reports the implementation of a quality management program to improve postoperative pain management at a university hospital.
METHODS: An interdisciplinary task force consisting of nursing staff, anesthesiologists, surgeons, and members of the hospital pharmacy was set up. This task force interviewed patients and performed an analysis of current deficits (phase 1). Then, primary and secondary outcome parameters were defined to measure quality of pain management, and strategies were defined to implement improvements (phase 2). These referred to aspects of organization, standardization, and responsibility. One of the main intentions was the involvement of nursing staff. After implementation (phase 3), a second analysis was performed (phase 4). This was followed by a continuous assessment of parameters indicating quality of procedures and results which were fed back to all participants (phase 5).
RESULTS: After implementation of the program (phase 4), significantly more patients reported no or mild (NRS < 4) postoperative pain (40.2% vs 30.1%) compared to phase 1. Also, patients' satisfaction with pain therapy improved significantly. The proportion of patients without pain treatment decreased by one-third. Opioids were given more frequently and more often intravenously. In contrast, the proportion of i.m. injections decreased from 20% to 5%. Continuous assessment of up to now more than 4,900 patients helped to identify possible reasons for problems and to maintain overall quality of pain management. DISCUSSION: Tools of quality management consisting of deficit analysis, definition of outcome parameters, implementation of improving strategies, post-intervention analysis and continuous feed-back may be successfully used to improve postoperative pain therapy. Changes in organization of medical management seem to be more important than medical or technical aspects. Similar strategies might be used to increase quality of other medical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11593869     DOI: 10.1007/s001010100194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  11 in total

1.  [Postoperative pain management after ambulatory surgery. A survey of anaesthesiologists].

Authors:  E A Lux; U Stamer; W Meissner; A Wiebalck
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Medication reconciliation for patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Pamela Kantelhardt; Alf Giese; Sven R Kantelhardt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Postoperative pain relief is an important factor for the patients' selection of a clinic. Results of an anonymous survey].

Authors:  C Simanski; R Lefering; T Paffrath; P Riess; N Yücel; M Maegele; C Thüsing; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].

Authors:  S Reiter-Theil; T Graf-Baumann; K Kutzer; H C Müller-Busch; R Stutzki; H C Traue; A Willweber-Strumpf; M Zimmermann; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  [Quality of postoperative pain therapy: evaluation of an established anesthesiology acute pain service].

Authors:  V Kainzwaldner; B Rachinger-Adam; T Mioc-Curic; T Wöhrle; L C Hinske; B Luchting; T Ewert; S C Azad
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Postoperative pain after ambulatory surgery].

Authors:  E A Lux; U Stamer; W Meissner; K Moser; E Neugebauer; A Wiebalck
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  [Pediatric postoperative quality analysis : Pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting].

Authors:  I Balga; C Konrad; W Meissner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Does patient satisfaction correlate with pain level during patient-monitored epidural analgesia. Evaluation of data from postoperative pain service].

Authors:  A Gottschalk; M Freitag; K Liehr; A Domke; M Schuster; T Standl
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  [Organization model for postoperative pain management in a basic-care hospital].

Authors:  W Bernd; H Seintsch; R Amstad; G Burri; V Weber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  [Implementation of standardized postoperative pain therapy for orthopaedic patients. Comparison between unsystematic and standardized pain therapy].

Authors:  S Goebel; N Wollmerstedt; A Lobmüller; M Walther; S Kirschner; J Eulert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.