Literature DB >> 11592779

Early to late sparing of radiation damage to the parotid gland by adrenergic and muscarinic receptor agonists.

R P Coppes1, L J Zeilstra, H H Kampinga, A W Konings.   

Abstract

Damage to salivary glands after radiotherapeutic treatment of head and neck tumours can severely impair the quality of life of the patients. In the current study we have investigated the early-to-late pathogenesis of the parotid gland after radiation. Also the ability to ameliorate the damage using pretreatment with adrenergic or muscarinic receptor agonists is studied. Rats were locally irradiated with or without i.p. pretreatment with phenylephrine (alpha-adrenoceptor agonist, 5 mg kg(-1)), isoproterenol (beta-adrenoceptor agonist, 5 mg kg(-1)), pilocarpine (4 mg kg(-1)), methacholine (3.75 mg kg(-1)) (muscarinic receptor agonists) or methacholine plus phenylephrine. Parotid salivary flow rate, amylase secretion, the number of cells and gland histology were monitored sequentially up to 240 days postirradiation. The effects were described in 4 distinct phases. The first phase (0-10 days) was characterised by a rapid decline in flow rate without changes in amylase secretion or acinar cell number. The second phase (10-60 days) consists of a decrease in amylase secretion and is paralleled by acinar cell loss. Flow rate, amylase secretion and acinar cell numbers do not change in the third phase (60-120 days). The fourth phase (120-240 days) is determined by a further deterioration of gland function but an increase in acinar cell number, albeit with poor tissue morphology. All drug pretreatments used could reduce radiation effects in phase I and II. The protective effects were lost during phase IV, with the exception of methacholine plus phenylephrine pretreatment. The latter combination of drugs ameliorated radiation-damage throughout the entire follow-up time. The data show that combined pre-irradiation stimulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors with methacholine plus alpha-adrenoceptors with phenylephrine can reduce both early and late damage, possibly involving the PLC/PIP2 second messenger pathways. This opens perspectives for the development of clinical applicable methods for long-term sparing of parotid glands subjected to radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11592779      PMCID: PMC2375094          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  39 in total

1.  Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Eisbruch; R K Ten Haken; H M Kim; L H Marsh; J A Ship
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Oral complications of cancer therapies. Pretherapy interventions to modify salivary dysfunction.

Authors:  A Wolff; J C Atkinson; A A Macynski; P C Fox
Journal:  NCI Monogr       Date:  1990

3.  Fractionated irradiation and early changes in salivary glands. Different effects on potassium efflux, exocytotic amylase release and gland morphology.

Authors:  L Franzén; U Funegård; S Sundström; H Gustafsson; A Danielsson; R Henriksson
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Oral pilocarpine for post-irradiation xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  J T Johnson; G A Ferretti; W J Nethery; I H Valdez; P C Fox; D Ng; C C Muscoplat; S C Gallagher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Contrasting dose-rate effects of gamma-irradiation on rat salivary gland function.

Authors:  A Vissink; J D Down; A W Konings
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Different effects of fractionated irradiation on potassium efflux and exocytotic amylase release.

Authors:  H Gustafsson; L Franzén; S Sundström; R Henriksson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1992

7.  Regulation of the cAMP signal transduction pathway by protein kinase C in rat submandibular cells.

Authors:  N Fleming; L Mellow; D Bhullar
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Major salivary gland function in patients with radiation-induced xerostomia: flow rates and sialochemistry.

Authors:  I H Valdez; J C Atkinson; J A Ship; P C Fox
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Use of pilocarpine during head and neck radiation therapy to reduce xerostomia and salivary dysfunction.

Authors:  I H Valdez; A Wolff; J C Atkinson; A A Macynski; P C Fox
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study of oral pilocarpine for treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  F G LeVeque; M Montgomery; D Potter; M B Zimmer; J W Rieke; B W Steiger; S C Gallagher; C C Muscoplat
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Clinical management of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients: successes and barriers.

Authors:  Arjan Vissink; James B Mitchell; Bruce J Baum; Kirsten H Limesand; Siri Beier Jensen; Philip C Fox; Linda S Elting; Johannes A Langendijk; Robert P Coppes; Mary E Reyland
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  On approaches to the functional restoration of salivary glands damaged by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, with a review of related aspects of salivary gland morphology and development.

Authors:  R S Redman
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Botulinum Toxin Confers Radioprotection in Murine Salivary Glands.

Authors:  Youssef H Zeidan; Nan Xiao; Hongbin Cao; Christina Kong; Quynh-Thu Le; Davud Sirjani
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Salivary gland progenitor cell biology provides a rationale for therapeutic salivary gland regeneration.

Authors:  I M A Lombaert; S M Knox; M P Hoffman
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.511

5.  Gene expression analysis reveals inhibition of radiation-induced TGFβ-signaling by hyperbaric oxygen therapy in mouse salivary glands.

Authors:  Linda Spiegelberg; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Wilfred F J Van Ijcken; Edwin Oole; Eppo B Wolvius; Jeroen Essers; Joanna A M Braks
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 6.354

6.  Internal and external generalizability of temporal dose-response relationships for xerostomia following IMRT for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Maria Thor; Adepitan A Owosho; Haley D Clark; Jung Hun Oh; Nadeem Riaz; Allan Hovan; Jillian Tsai; Steven D Thomas; Sae Hee K Yom; Jonn S Wu; Joseph M Huryn; Vitali Moiseenko; Nancy Y Lee; Cherry L Estilo; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement of the parotid gland parenchyma.

Authors:  Maja Bruvo; Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08

Review 8.  Anatomy, biogenesis and regeneration of salivary glands.

Authors:  Kyle V Holmberg; Matthew P Hoffman
Journal:  Monogr Oral Sci       Date:  2014-05-23

9.  Effect of induction chemotherapy on swallow physiology and saliva production in patients with head and neck cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bharat B Mittal; Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Muveddet Discekici-Harris; Irene B Helenowski; Ann Mellot; Mark Agulnik; Jerilyn A Logemann
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Dispersed donor salivary gland cells are widely distributed in the recipient gland when infused up the ductal tree.

Authors:  R S Redman; W D Ball; E Mezey; S Key
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.