BACKGROUND: [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] angiotensin I is an ACE-resistant substrate specific for chymase. We used this peptide to determine whether a functionally significant non-ACE angiotensin (Ang) II-generating pathway exists in human dorsal hand veins. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a modified Aellig technique, we studied the response to Ang I and [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I in dorsal hand veins in vivo in patients with coronary heart disease. We measured the venoconstrictor effect of each peptide given before and after a 6.25-mg oral dose of the ACE inhibitor captopril or matching placebo. Placebo or captopril was given in a double-blind, randomized fashion. Ang I induced a mean+/-SEM venoconstrictor response of 45+/-11%, 40+/-10%, 55+/-8%, and 4+/-4% before placebo, after placebo, before captopril, and after captopril, respectively. Hence, the response to Ang I was reproducible and was reduced significantly only after treatment with captopril (P=0.002). [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I induced a mean venoconstrictor response of 42+/-9%, 49+/-9%, 48+/-10%, and 54+/-11% before placebo, after placebo, before captopril, and after captopril, respectively. Hence, captopril had no significant effect on the response to [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I is able to induce venoconstriction in humans in vivo. With this specific pharmacological probe, we have shown that a non-ACE pathway capable of generating Ang II exists in human veins in vivo and is potentially functionally important. This pathway is likely to involve the enzyme chymase.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] angiotensin I is an ACE-resistant substrate specific for chymase. We used this peptide to determine whether a functionally significant non-ACE angiotensin (Ang) II-generating pathway exists in human dorsal hand veins. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a modified Aellig technique, we studied the response to Ang I and [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I in dorsal hand veins in vivo in patients with coronary heart disease. We measured the venoconstrictor effect of each peptide given before and after a 6.25-mg oral dose of the ACE inhibitor captopril or matching placebo. Placebo or captopril was given in a double-blind, randomized fashion. Ang I induced a mean+/-SEM venoconstrictor response of 45+/-11%, 40+/-10%, 55+/-8%, and 4+/-4% before placebo, after placebo, before captopril, and after captopril, respectively. Hence, the response to Ang I was reproducible and was reduced significantly only after treatment with captopril (P=0.002). [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I induced a mean venoconstrictor response of 42+/-9%, 49+/-9%, 48+/-10%, and 54+/-11% before placebo, after placebo, before captopril, and after captopril, respectively. Hence, captopril had no significant effect on the response to [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that [Pro(11)(D)-Ala(12)] Ang I is able to induce venoconstriction in humans in vivo. With this specific pharmacological probe, we have shown that a non-ACE pathway capable of generating Ang II exists in human veins in vivo and is potentially functionally important. This pathway is likely to involve the enzyme chymase.
Authors: Ming Li; Ke Liu; Jan Michalicek; James A Angus; John E Hunt; Louis J Dell'Italia; Michael P Feneley; Robert M Graham; Ahsan Husain Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 14.808