BACKGROUND: The time required for oxygen uptake (O(2)) to return to baseline level (recovery kinetics) is prolonged in patients with reduced ventricular function, and the degree to which it is prolonged is related to the severity of heart failure, markers of abnormal ventilation, and prognosis. In the present study, we sought to determine the effect of exercise training on O(2) recovery kinetics in patients with reduced ventricular function. METHODS:Twenty-four male patients with reduced ventricular function after a myocardial infarction were randomized to either a 2-month high-intensity residential exercise training program or to a control group. O(2) kinetics in recovery from maximal exercise were calculated before and after the study period and expressed as the slope of a single exponential relation between O(2) and time during the first 3 min of recovery. RESULTS:Peak O(2) increased significantly in the exercise group (19.4 +/- 3.0 mL/kg/min vs 25.1 +/- 4.7 mL/kg/min, p < 0.05), whereas no change was observed in control subjects. The O(2) half-time in recovery was reduced slightly after the study period in both groups (108.7 +/- 33.1 to 102.1 +/- 50.5 s in the exercise group and 122.3 +/- 68.7 to 107.5 +/- 36.0 s in the control group); neither the change within or between groups was significant. The degree to which O(2) was prolonged in recovery was inversely related to measures of exercise capacity (peak O(2), watts achieved, and exercise time; r = - 0.48 to - 0.57; p < 0.01) and directly related to the peak ventilatory equivalents for oxygen (r = 0.59, p < 0.01) and carbon dioxide (r = 0.57, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Two months of high-intensity training did not result in a faster recovery of O(2) in patients with reduced ventricular function. This suggests that adaptations to exercise training manifest themselves only during, but not in, recovery from exercise.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The time required for oxygen uptake (O(2)) to return to baseline level (recovery kinetics) is prolonged in patients with reduced ventricular function, and the degree to which it is prolonged is related to the severity of heart failure, markers of abnormal ventilation, and prognosis. In the present study, we sought to determine the effect of exercise training on O(2) recovery kinetics in patients with reduced ventricular function. METHODS: Twenty-four male patients with reduced ventricular function after a myocardial infarction were randomized to either a 2-month high-intensity residential exercise training program or to a control group. O(2) kinetics in recovery from maximal exercise were calculated before and after the study period and expressed as the slope of a single exponential relation between O(2) and time during the first 3 min of recovery. RESULTS: Peak O(2) increased significantly in the exercise group (19.4 +/- 3.0 mL/kg/min vs 25.1 +/- 4.7 mL/kg/min, p < 0.05), whereas no change was observed in control subjects. The O(2) half-time in recovery was reduced slightly after the study period in both groups (108.7 +/- 33.1 to 102.1 +/- 50.5 s in the exercise group and 122.3 +/- 68.7 to 107.5 +/- 36.0 s in the control group); neither the change within or between groups was significant. The degree to which O(2) was prolonged in recovery was inversely related to measures of exercise capacity (peak O(2), watts achieved, and exercise time; r = - 0.48 to - 0.57; p < 0.01) and directly related to the peak ventilatory equivalents for oxygen (r = 0.59, p < 0.01) and carbon dioxide (r = 0.57, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Two months of high-intensity training did not result in a faster recovery of O(2) in patients with reduced ventricular function. This suggests that adaptations to exercise training manifest themselves only during, but not in, recovery from exercise.
Authors: Linda Long; Ify R Mordi; Charlene Bridges; Viral A Sagar; Edward J Davies; Andrew Js Coats; Hasnain Dalal; Karen Rees; Sally J Singh; Rod S Taylor Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-01-29
Authors: A M Moreno; R R T Castro; B M Silva; H Villacorta; M Sant'Anna Junior; A C L Nóbrega Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: Rod S Taylor; Viral A Sagar; Ed J Davies; Simon Briscoe; Andrew J S Coats; Hayes Dalal; Fiona Lough; Karen Rees; Sally Singh Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-04-27