Literature DB >> 11591196

Difference in exposure to airborne major rat allergen (Rat n 1) and to endotoxin in rat quarters according to tasks.

F Lieutier-Colas1, P Meyer, P Larsson, P Malmberg, N Frossard, G Pauli, F de Blay.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Endotoxins found in occupational settings constitute a risk factor in the severity of respiratory allergic symptoms.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the airborne concentrations of major rat allergen (Rat n 1) and endotoxin under various circumstances.
METHODS: We took 483 airborne samples from 12 sites: 114 individual samples for endotoxin measurements and 113 for Rat n 1, from 38 workers (nine animal technicians, nine laboratory technicians, nine scientists and 11 students); and 256 static samples in rat rooms and experimental rooms, with or without disturbance, for simultaneous endotoxin and Rat n 1 measurements. Rat n 1 was measured with a two-site monoclonal ELISA and endotoxins with the Limulus method.
RESULTS: Airborne Rat n 1 and endotoxin were significantly higher in rat rooms than in experimental rooms. Animal technicians had the greatest exposure to both Rat n 1 and endotoxin. Cage cleaning and rat feeding induced the highest exposure to Rat n 1 and endotoxin. Furthermore, we observed no significant difference in endotoxin exposure between researchers with or without rat contact during the sample period. There was no correlation between the number of rats present and airborne endotoxin concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to airborne Rat n 1 and endotoxin is higher during cleaning and feeding tasks than during any other task, we feel that a major source of both is contaminated bedding that becomes airborne during disturbance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591196     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01180.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  7 in total

1.  Is there a need for special preventive medical check-ups in employees exposed to experimental animal dust?

Authors:  Klaus Schmid; Barbara Jüngert; Meta Hager; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Gene-environment interactions influence airways function in laboratory animal workers.

Authors:  Karin A Pacheco; Cecile S Rose; Lori J Silveira; Michael V Van Dyke; Kelly Goelz; Kristyn MacPhail; Lisa A Maier
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 3.  Laboratory Animal Allergy in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Meinir Jones
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Association of Toll-like receptor 4 alleles with symptoms and sensitization to laboratory animals.

Authors:  Karin Pacheco; Lisa Maier; Lori Silveira; Kelly Goelz; Kristyn Noteware; Bevin Luna; Ron du Bois; Jim Murphy; Cecile Rose
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Predictors for Increased and Reduced Rat and Mouse Allergen Exposure in Laboratory Animal Facilities.

Authors:  Anne Straumfors; Wijnand Eduard; Knut Andresen; Ann Kristin Sjaastad
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 6.  Animal allergens and their presence in the environment.

Authors:  Eva Zahradnik; Monika Raulf
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Respiratory Allergens from Furred Mammals: Environmental and Occupational Exposure.

Authors:  Eva Zahradnik; Monika Raulf
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2017-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.