Literature DB >> 11591118

Heterosubtypic immunity against human influenza A viruses, including recently emerged avian H5 and H9 viruses, induced by FLU-ISCOM vaccine in mice requires both cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and macrophage function.

S Sambhara1, A Kurichh, R Miranda, T Tumpey, T Rowe, M Renshaw, R Arpino, A Tamane, A Kandil, O James, B Underdown, M Klein, J Katz, D Burt.   

Abstract

Induction of heterosubtypic immunity to influenza viral antigens is of paramount importance to the prevention of epidemics and potential pandemics. The 1997 incidence of avian influenza infections in humans in Hong Kong heightened the need for pandemic preparedness and a search for vaccines and vaccine delivery systems that can confer broad protection. In this report, we demonstrate that the delivery of H1N1 subtype influenza viral antigens as immunostimulating complexes (ISCOM) induces broad cross-protection in mice against challenge with various influenza virus subtypes, including the avian H9 and the H5 strains that were recently responsible for deaths in humans. The ISCOM delivery system induced high and long-lived serum antiviral antibodies and class I-restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL). Studies with perforin, IFN-gamma, and mu-chain gene knock-out mice demonstrated that the heterosubtypic protection required cross-reactive, functional cytotoxic T cells and nonhemagglutination inhibiting serum antibodies. Interferon-gamma, a major player in viral clearance by nonlytic mechanisms, did not appear to play a role in heterosubtypic immunity. Nonformulated H1N1 influenza antigens failed to induce significant CTL or long-lasting antibody responses or to protect mice against challenge with heterosubtypic viruses. Furthermore, while influenza virus infection induced a dominant nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CTL response in H2 mice, the ISCOM delivery system induced a dominant hemagglutinin-specific CTL response. Moreover, non-neutralizing but cross-reactive antibodies played a role in reducing viral titers by macrophages. These results suggest that exogenous delivery of influenza antigens as ISCOM can influence their antigen processing and presentation, their ability to induce/recall CTL specificities, and their capacity to mediate broad cross-protection against influenza virus variants. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591118     DOI: 10.1006/cimm.2001.1835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Immunol        ISSN: 0008-8749            Impact factor:   4.868


  62 in total

Review 1.  Influenza vaccines: present and future.

Authors:  Peter Palese; Adolfo García-Sastre
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Immunity to influenza: the challenges of protecting an aging population.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Katz; Julie Plowden; Mary Renshaw-Hoelscher; Xiuhua Lu; Terrence M Tumpey; Suryaprakash Sambhara
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 3.  Mucosal immunity: overcoming the barrier for induction of proximal responses.

Authors:  Brent S McKenzie; Jamie L Brady; Andrew M Lew
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.829

4.  Seasonal H1N1 influenza virus infection induces cross-protective pandemic H1N1 virus immunity through a CD8-independent, B cell-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Yuan Fang; David Banner; Alyson A Kelvin; Stephen S H Huang; Christopher J Paige; Steven A Corfe; Kevin P Kane; R Chris Bleackley; Thomas Rowe; Alberto J Leon; David J Kelvin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Vaccination inducing broad and improved cross protection against multiple subtypes of influenza A virus.

Authors:  Jae-Min Song; Nico Van Rooijen; Jadranka Bozja; Richard W Compans; Sang-Moo Kang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  New pre-pandemic influenza vaccines: an egg- and adjuvant-independent human adenoviral vector strategy induces long-lasting protective immune responses in mice.

Authors:  M A Hoelscher; L Jayashankar; S Garg; V Veguilla; X Lu; N Singh; J M Katz; S K Mittal; S Sambhara
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Traditional and new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  A broadly protective vaccine against globally dispersed clade 1 and clade 2 H5N1 influenza viruses.

Authors:  Mary A Hoelscher; Neetu Singh; Sanjay Garg; Lakshmi Jayashankar; Vic Veguilla; Aseem Pandey; Yumi Matsuoka; Jacqueline M Katz; Ruben Donis; Suresh K Mittal; Suryaprakash Sambhara
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Immune mechanisms of protection: can adjuvants rise to the challenge?

Authors:  Amy S McKee; Megan K L MacLeod; John W Kappler; Philippa Marrack
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 10.  Influenza: the virus and prophylaxis with inactivated influenza vaccine in "at risk" groups, including COPD patients.

Authors:  Arnt-Ove Hovden; Rebecca Jane Cox; Lars Reinhardt Haaheim
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.