Literature DB >> 11591027

A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment.

R Ramanathan1.   

Abstract

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an intrinsically complex multi-dimensional process, involving multiple criteria and multiple actors. Multi-criteria methods can serve as useful decision aids for carrying out the EIA. This paper proposes the use of a multi-criteria technique, namely the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), for the purpose. AHP has the flexibility to combine quantitative and qualitative factors, to handle different groups of actors, to combine the opinions expressed by many experts, and can help in stakeholder analysis. The main shortcomings of AHP and some modifications to it to overcome the shortcomings are briefly described. Finally, the use of AHP is illustrated for a case study involving socio-economic impact assessment. In this case study, AHP has been used for capturing the perceptions of stakeholders on the relative severity of different socio-economic impacts, which will help the authorities in prioritizing their environmental management plan, and can also help in allocating the budget available for mitigating adverse socio-economic impacts.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591027     DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  11 in total

1.  Quality evaluation of yellow peach chips prepared by explosion puffing drying.

Authors:  Jian Lyu; Lin-Yan Zhou; Jin-Feng Bi; Xuan Liu; Xin-Ye Wu
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modeling and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Luis A Bojórquez-Tapia; Salvadur Sánchez-Colon; Arturo Florez
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Multi-criteria assessment of tensions in resource use at continental scale: a proof of concept with Australian rangelands.

Authors:  Michael J Hill; Robert Lesslie; Randall Donohue; Paul Houlder; Jane Holloway; Jodie Smith; Kim Ritman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Groundwater vulnerability assessment for organic compounds: fuzzy multi-criteria approach for Mexico city.

Authors:  Marisa Mazari-Hiriart; Gustavo Cruz-Bello; Luis A Bojórquez-Tapia; Lourdes Juárez-Marusich; Georgina Alcantar-López; Luis E Marín; Ernesto Soto-Galera
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  ICCLP: an inexact chance-constrained linear programming model for land-use management of lake areas in urban fringes.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Xiaosheng Qin; Huaicheng Guo; Feng Zhou; Jinfeng Wang; Xiaojian Lv; Guozhu Mao
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Fire risk evaluation using multicriteria analysis--a case study.

Authors:  Krishna Prasad Vadrevu; Anuradha Eaturu; K V S Badarinath
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  A novel health evaluation strategy for multifunctional self-validating sensors.

Authors:  Zhengguang Shen; Qi Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses.

Authors:  Pablo Cabrera-Barona; Thomas Murphy; Stefan Kienberger; Thomas Blaschke
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Characterizing preferences of fishermen to inform decision-making: A case study of the Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) fishery off Alaska.

Authors:  Elizabeth Figus; Keith R Criddle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Applying the goal programming in the management of the 7P marketing mix model at universities-case study.

Authors:  Radoslaw Ryńca; Yasmin Ziaeian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.