Literature DB >> 11590629

A three-stage clinical trial design for rare disorders.

V E Honkanen1, A F Siegel, J P Szalai, V Berger, B M Feldman, J N Siegel.   

Abstract

Many clinical trials of uncommon diseases are underpowered because of the difficulty of recruiting adequate numbers of subjects. We propose a clinical trial design with improved statistical power compared to the traditional randomized trial for use in clinical trials of rare diseases. The three-stage clinical trial design consists of an initial randomized placebo-controlled stage, a randomized withdrawal stage for subjects who responded, and a third randomized stage for placebo non-responders who subsequently respond to treatment. Test level and power were assessed by computer-intensive exact calculations. The three-stage clinical trial design was found to be consistently superior to the traditional randomized trial design in all cases examined, with sample sizes typically reduced by 20 per cent to 30 per cent while maintaining comparable power. When a treatment clearly superior to placebo was considered, our design reached a power of 75 per cent with a sample of 21 patients compared with the 52 needed to attain this power when only a randomized controlled trial was used. In situations where patient numbers are limited, a three-stage clinical trial design may be a more powerful design than the traditional randomized trial for detecting clinical benefits. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11590629     DOI: 10.1002/sim.980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

Review 1.  Innovative study design for paediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Paola Baiardi; Carlo Giaquinto; Silvia Girotto; Cristina Manfredi; Adriana Ceci
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Systemic sclerosis disease modification clinical trials design: quo vadis?

Authors:  Fabian A Mendoza; Lynette L Keyes-Elstein; Sergio A Jimenez
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Two-stage randomized trials: outstanding issues.

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Bayesian approach to the assessment of the population-specific risk of inhibitors in hemophilia A patients: a case study.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Alfonso Iorio; Maura Marcucci; Vadim Romanov; Eleanor M Pullenayegum; John K Marshall; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2016-10-25

Review 5.  Experimental designs for small randomised clinical trials: an algorithm for choice.

Authors:  Catherine Cornu; Behrouz Kassai; Roland Fisch; Catherine Chiron; Corinne Alberti; Renzo Guerrini; Anna Rosati; Gerard Pons; Harm Tiddens; Sylvie Chabaud; Daan Caudri; Clément Ballot; Polina Kurbatova; Anne-Charlotte Castellan; Agathe Bajard; Patrice Nony; Leon Aarons; Agathe Bajard; Clément Ballot; Yves Bertrand; Frank Bretz; Daan Caudri; Charlotte Castellan; Sylvie Chabaud; Catherine Cornu; Frank Dufour; Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf; Jean-Marc Dupont; Roland Fisch; Renzo Guerrini; Vincent Jullien; Behrouz Kassaï; Patrice Nony; Kayode Ogungbenro; David Pérol; Gérard Pons; Harm Tiddens; Anna Rosati; Corinne Alberti; Catherine Chiron; Polina Kurbatova; Rima Nabbout
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.123

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.