J Castro1, L Lazaro, F Pons, I Halperin, J Toro. 1. Section of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. 16812jcf@comb.es
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bone mineral density (BMD) loss can be reversed in adolescent anorexic patients. METHOD: A prospective study with 108 anorexia nervosa patients (DSM-IV) from 12 to 17 years of age at the Eating Disorders Unit in the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain). They were first evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in lumbar spine and femoral neck consecutively from 1997 until 1999 and reexamined after 6 to 30 months. Results were compared with normative values of bone mass. RESULTS: Patients with poor outcome (n = 44) had a bone mass loss. Patients with good short-term outcome were divided in two groups. The group with normal BMD at first evaluation (n = 41) had a bone mass gain per year of 3.0% at lumbar spine and 0.5% at femoral neck. The group with low BMD at first evaluation (n = 23) had an increase per year of 9.1% at lumbar spine and 4.5% at femoral neck. In a multiple linear regression analysis with the variables body mass index, age, months with menstruation, and BMD zscore at first evaluation, the only predictor of BMD increase was the first z score both at the lumbar spine (coefficient R = 0.64; p < .001) and at the femoral neck (coefficient R = 0.5; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a catch-up effect in adolescent patients with low BMD but good short-term outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bone mineral density (BMD) loss can be reversed in adolescent anorexic patients. METHOD: A prospective study with 108 anorexia nervosapatients (DSM-IV) from 12 to 17 years of age at the Eating Disorders Unit in the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain). They were first evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in lumbar spine and femoral neck consecutively from 1997 until 1999 and reexamined after 6 to 30 months. Results were compared with normative values of bone mass. RESULTS:Patients with poor outcome (n = 44) had a bone mass loss. Patients with good short-term outcome were divided in two groups. The group with normal BMD at first evaluation (n = 41) had a bone mass gain per year of 3.0% at lumbar spine and 0.5% at femoral neck. The group with low BMD at first evaluation (n = 23) had an increase per year of 9.1% at lumbar spine and 4.5% at femoral neck. In a multiple linear regression analysis with the variables body mass index, age, months with menstruation, and BMD zscore at first evaluation, the only predictor of BMD increase was the first z score both at the lumbar spine (coefficient R = 0.64; p < .001) and at the femoral neck (coefficient R = 0.5; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a catch-up effect in adolescent patients with low BMD but good short-term outcome.
Authors: Stella Blasel; Ulrich Pilatus; Joerg Magerkurth; Maya von Stauffenberg; Dmitri Vronski; Manuel Mueller; Lars Woeckel; Elke Hattingen Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Maureen J Devlin; Alison M Cloutier; Nishina A Thomas; David A Panus; Sutada Lotinun; Ilka Pinz; Roland Baron; Clifford J Rosen; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Madhusmita Misra; Rajani Prabhakaran; Karen K Miller; Mark A Goldstein; Diane Mickley; Laura Clauss; Patrice Lockhart; Jennalee Cord; David B Herzog; Debra K Katzman; Anne Klibanski Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-12-18 Impact factor: 5.958