Literature DB >> 11588758

Comparison of fatigue life for 3 types of manual wheelchairs.

S G Fitzgerald1, R A Cooper, M L Boninger, A J Rentschler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine 3 types of manual wheelchairs-ultralight wheelchairs (UWs), lightweight wheelchairs (LWs), and depot wheelchairs (DWs)-and to compare the fatigue life between the wheelchair types.
DESIGN: A database of different manual wheelchairs tested according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Fatigue life was determined by using standards that define methods accepted internationally using double-drum and curb-drop testing equipment.
SETTING: A rehabilitation engineering center. SPECIMENS: Sixty-one manual wheelchairs: 25 DWs, 22 UWs, and 14 LWs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Wheelchairs were examined for differences in fatigue life based on equivalent cycles. Unique survival curves were fit and compared for each wheelchair type.
RESULTS: The UWs lasted the longest, with a mean of 309,362 equivalent cycles. The DWs faired the worst, with a mean of 117,210 equivalent cycles. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different (p < .001), with the UWs having the longest fatigue life.
CONCLUSION: Fatigue life for UWs is significantly greater (p < .05) than LWs and DWs, indicating wheelchairs differ in durability. Copyright 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588758     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.26139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  8 in total

1.  Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Wheelchair standards: it's all about quality assurance and evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Rory A Cooper
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Increases in wheelchair breakdowns, repairs, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lynn Worobey; Michelle Oyster; Gregory Nemunaitis; Rory Cooper; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Quality and Equity in Wheelchairs Used by Veterans.

Authors:  Larissa Myaskovsky; Shasha Gao; Leslie R M Hausmann; Kellee R Bornemann; Kelly H Burkitt; Galen E Switzer; Michael J Fine; Samuel L Phillips; David Gater; Ann M Spungen; Lynn Worobey; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Vulnerable Groups Living with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Denise C Fyffe; Amanda L Botticello; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2011

6.  Evidence-Based Strategies for Preserving Mobility for Elderly and Aging Manual Wheelchair Users.

Authors:  Philip S Requejo; Jan Furumasu; Sara J Mulroy
Journal:  Top Geriatr Rehabil       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Developing product quality standards for wheelchairs used in less-resourced environments.

Authors:  Anand Mhatre; Daniel Martin; Matt McCambridge; Norman Reese; Mark Sullivan; Don Schoendorfer; Eric Wunderlich; Chris Rushman; Dave Mahilo; Jon Pearlman
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-08

8.  Development of wheelchair caster testing equipment and preliminary testing of caster models.

Authors:  Anand Mhatre; Joseph Ott; Jonathan Pearlman
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.