Literature DB >> 11588741

Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: a multicenter study.

P H Peckham1, M W Keith, K L Kilgore, J H Grill, K S Wuolle, G B Thrope, P Gorman, J Hobby, M J Mulcahey, S Carroll, V R Hentz, A Wiegner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an implanted neuroprosthesis that allows tetraplegic users to control grasp and release in 1 hand.
DESIGN: Multicenter cohort trial with at least 3 years of follow-up. Function for each participant was compared before and after implantation, and with and without the neuroprosthesis activated.
SETTING: Tertiary spinal cord injury (SCI) care centers, 8 in the United States, 1 in the United Kingdom, and 1 in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one tetraplegic adults with C5 or C6 SCIs. INTERVENTION: An implanted neuroprosthetic system, in which electric stimulation of the grasping muscles of 1 arm are controlled by using contralateral shoulder movements, and concurrent tendon transfer surgery. Assessed participants' ability to grasp, move, and release standardized objects; degree of assistance required to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), device usage; and user satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pinch force; grasp and release tests; ADL abilities test and ADL assessment test; and user satisfaction survey.
RESULTS: Pinch force was significantly greater with the neuroprosthesis in all available 50 participants, and grasp-release abilities were improved in 49. All tested participants (49/49) were more independent in performing ADLs with the neuroprosthesis than they were without it. Home use of the device for regular function and exercise was reported by over 90% of the participants, and satisfaction with the neuroprosthesis was high.
CONCLUSIONS: The grasping ability provided by the neuroprosthesis is substantial and lasting. The neuroprosthesis is safe, well accepted by users, and offers improved independence for a population without comparable alternatives. Copyright 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588741     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  58 in total

1.  Development of less invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation model for motor therapy in rodents.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yoshihiko Kato; Hidenori Suzuki; Yasuaki Imajo; Yuichiro Yoshida; Atsushi Moriya; Toshihiko Taguchi; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Comparison of two multi-criteria decision techniques for eliciting treatment preferences in people with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Maarten J Ijzerman; Janine A van Til; Govert J Snoek
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation induced forelimb movement in a rodent model.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kanchiku; James V Lynskey; Danielle Protas; James J Abbas; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  The development of brain-machine interface neuroprosthetic devices.

Authors:  Parag G Patil; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control.

Authors:  Kevin L Kilgore; Harry A Hoyen; Anne M Bryden; Ronald L Hart; Michael W Keith; P Hunter Peckham
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Probability-based prediction of activity in multiple arm muscles: implications for functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Chad V Anderson; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Designing the optical interface of a transcutaneous optical telemetry link.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Brian Smith; Xiao-Feng Wang; Kevin L Kilgore; P Hunter Peckham
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland; Dean J Krusienski; William A Sarnacki; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Chester H Ho; Ronald J Triolo; Anastasia L Elias; Kevin L Kilgore; Anthony F DiMarco; Kath Bogie; Albert H Vette; Musa L Audu; Rudi Kobetic; Sarah R Chang; K Ming Chan; Sean Dukelow; Dennis J Bourbeau; Steven W Brose; Kenneth J Gustafson; Zelma H T Kiss; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring arm and hand function in people with high level tetraplegia.

Authors:  William D Memberg; Katharine H Polasek; Ronald L Hart; Anne M Bryden; Kevin L Kilgore; Gregory A Nemunaitis; Harry A Hoyen; Michael W Keith; Robert F Kirsch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.