Literature DB >> 11588535

Efficacy, tolerability, and impact on quality of life of long-term treatment with manidipine or amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension.

A Zanchetti1, S Omboni, P La Commare, R De Cesaris, P Palatini.   

Abstract

This double-blind, multicenter trial compared antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability, and impact on quality of life of manidipine and amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Patients were randomly assigned to 48 weeks of once-daily manidipine, 10-20 mg, or amlodipine, 5-10 mg. Patients who did not respond to treatment after 12 weeks were also given enalapril, 10-20 mg, for the study's duration. The main efficacy end point was equivalence in sitting systolic (SiSBP) and diastolic (SiDBP) blood pressure reduction between the two drugs after 8 weeks (per protocol analysis). An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed in all patients with at least one efficacy determination during treatment. Quality of life was assessed by the "Subjective Symptoms Assessment Profile" (SSA-P) and "General Well-being Schedule" (GWBS), after 12 weeks of treatment. SiSBP reduction after 8 weeks was equivalent for manidipine (15.2 mm Hg, n = 227) and amlodipine (17.0 mm Hg, n = 219). The corresponding figure for SiDBP was 11.3 mm Hg for manidipine and 12.3 mm Hg for amlodipine. In the larger ITT population SiDBP was similarly and significantly reduced by manidipine (from 102 +/- 5 to 88 +/- 9 mm Hg, n = 241) and amlodipine (from 101 +/- 5 to 87 +/- 8 mm Hg, n = 240). Similar results were observed for SiSBP and standing SBP and DBP. Neither drug changed sitting or standing heart rate compared with baseline. SSA-P scores improved with manidipine but not amlodipine. GWBS total and partial scores increased more with manidipine than with amlodipine. Safety profile favored manidipine, which was associated with significantly less ankle edema than was amlodipine. This study shows for the first time that long-term treatment with the long-acting calcium channel blocker manidipine is as effective as treatment with amlodipine, has a better tolerability profile, and induces greater improvement in quality of life than amlodipine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588535     DOI: 10.1097/00005344-200110000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  15 in total

Review 1.  Antihypertensive effect of manidipine.

Authors:  Alex Roca-Cusachs; Filippos Triposkiadis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Closing remarks: current position of calcium channel antagonists in hypertension--the role of manidipine.

Authors:  Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of manidipine versus amlodipine in elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension: MAISH study.

Authors:  Antonio Coca Payeras; Krzysztof Sladek; Giuseppe Lembo; Marco Alberici
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Manidipine: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  S M Cheer; K McClellan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Combination delapril/manidipine as antihypertensive therapy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Roberto Fogari; Amedeo Mugellini; Maria Circelli; Giovanni Cremonesi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Vasodilatory edema: a common side effect of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Manidipine for hypertension not controlled by dual therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a non-comparative, open-label study.

Authors:  Nieves Martell-Claros; Juan Jose de la Cruz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  Manidipine: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Effects of manidipine vs. amlodipine on intrarenal haemodynamics in patients with arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Christian Ott; Markus P Schneider; Ulrike Raff; Martin Ritt; Kristina Striepe; Marco Alberici; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.