Literature DB >> 11588508

Tolerability of enteric-coated didanosine capsules compared with didanosine tablets in adults with HIV infection.

L M Kunches1, N E Reinhalter, A Marquis, E Coakley, C Cohen, A B Morris, J M Mazzullo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new enteric-coated (EC) didanosine (ddI) formulation (Videx EC; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.) may be better tolerated than the tablet form because it lacks the buffer component thought to be responsible for diarrhea and other gastrointestinal (GI) side effects.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and magnitude of GI side effects (nausea, bloating, GI upset, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, gas [flatus]) before and after switching the formulation of ddI, in study subjects who were experiencing one or more GI symptom(s) of at least moderate severity.
METHODS: A 6-week open label crossover study of current didanosine tablet users comparing daily symptom scores (7 point scale, 0 = absent to 6 = very severe) during weeks 1 to 2 (on tablets) to weeks 4 and 6 (on EC capsules). Formulation palatability and preference, lifestyle effects, and use of antidiarrheals or other medications for symptom relief were also assessed.
RESULTS: GI symptom scores (7-day means) on tablets were diarrhea 2.11, gas 2.00, bloating 1.23, abdominal cramps 0.74, GI upset 0.69, nausea 0.66. After switching to EC (week 4 and week 6), mean scores decreased for diarrhea (mean scores 0.99 week 4, 0.79 week 6), gas (0.95, 0.79), bloating (0.49, 0.32), abdominal cramps (0.21, 0.05), GI upset (0.16, 0.14), and nausea (0.32, 0.22). Severity of all GI symptoms was significantly reduced after 4 weeks on EC capsules ( p <.01 by paired t- test). Negative impact of side effects on routine activities was significantly reduced (41% on tablet vs. 7% on EC; p <.01). All 42 study subjects preferred the EC form.
CONCLUSIONS: According to patients' diary scores, switching to ddI in EC form significantly reduces nausea, bloating, GI upset, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and gas for individuals who experienced GI side effects while taking the buffered tablet form. The striking tolerability advantages appear to support routine switching to EC for such patients and may suggest that widespread preferential selection of the EC form is appropriate to enhance didanosine tolerability and promote treatment adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588508     DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200110010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  2 in total

Review 1.  Didanosine enteric-coated capsule: current role in patients with HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Santiago Moreno; Beatriz Hernández; Fernando Dronda
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based second-line antiretroviral therapy without resistance in a large HIV treatment program in South Africa.

Authors:  Julie H Levison; Catherine Orrell; Sébastien Gallien; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Naishin Fu; Elena Losina; Kenneth A Freedberg; Robin Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.