Literature DB >> 11588318

Procedural safety and short-term outcome of ambulatory carotid stenting.

N Al-Mubarak1, G S Roubin, J J Vitek, G New, S S Iyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ambulatory procedures increase patient comfort and enhance cost-effectiveness. We sought to determine the feasibility and safety of ambulatory carotid stenting.
METHODS: A selected group of patients was admitted and discharged the same day after the carotid stenting procedure. Immediate and short-term outcomes are reported.
RESULTS: A total of 98 ambulatory carotid stenting procedures (98 hemispheres in 92 patients) were performed. There were 66 men (72%), and the mean age was 70+/-9 years. Of the patients, 28% had neurological symptoms related to the treated artery within 3 months before the procedure. Sixteen percent of the patients had prior carotid endarterectomy, 4% had prior ipsilateral neck radiation, and 8% had complete occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery. Successful access site hemostasis was ensured in all patients with suture-mediated vascular closure devices in 96 (98%) and manual compression in 2. Clinical follow-up was available for 96% of the patients at a mean time of 6+/-4 months. There were no neurological events, deaths, repeated procedures, or major access site complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory carotid stenting is both safe and feasible. This approach will enhance the applicability of the procedure by increasing patient comfort and potentially reducing procedural costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588318     DOI: 10.1161/hs1001.096005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  5 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Can periprocedural hypotension in carotid artery stenting be predicted? A carotid morphologic autonomic pathologic scoring model using virtual histology to anticipate hypotension.

Authors:  A Tsurumi; S Miyachi; O Hososhima; T Izumi; T Ohshima; N Matsubara; T Kinkori; T Naito; T Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  An evaluation of immediate sheath removal and use of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device in neuroradiological interventions.

Authors:  L Pierot; D Herbreteau; S Bracard; J Berge; C Cognard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Comparison of mid-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting for moderate versus critical stenosis.

Authors:  Josef Veselka; Petra Zimolová; Lucie Martinkovičová; Pavol Tomašov; Petr Hájek; Martin Malý; Miloslav Spaček; David Zemánek; David Tesař
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 5.  Direct carotid puncture in acute ischaemic stroke intervention.

Authors:  Elisa Colombo; Lorenzo Rinaldo; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2020-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.