BACKGROUND: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation has been demonstrated to relieve upper airway obstruction acutely, but its effect on obstructive sleep apnea is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the response in obstructive sleep apnea to electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. METHODS: Eight patients with obstructive sleep apnea were implanted with a device that stimulated the hypoglossal nerve unilaterally during inspiration. Sleep and breathing patterns were examined at baseline before implantation and after implantation at 1, 3, and 6 months and last follow-up. RESULTS: Unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation decreased the severity of obstructive sleep apnea throughout the entire study period. Specifically, stimulation significantly reduced the mean apnea-hypopnea indices in non-rapid eye movement (mean +/- SD episodes per hour, 52.0 +/- 20.4 for baseline nights and 22.6 +/- 12.1 for stimulation nights; P<.001) and rapid eye movement (48.2 +/- 30.5 and 16.6 +/- 17.1, respectively; P<.001) sleep and reduced the severity of oxyhemoglobin desaturations. With improvement in sleep apnea, a trend toward deeper stages of non-rapid eye movement sleep was observed. Moreover, all patients tolerated long-term stimulation at night and did not experience any adverse effects from stimulation. Even after completing the study protocol, the 3 patients who remained free from stimulator malfunction continued to use this device as primary treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the feasibility and therapeutic potential for hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea.
BACKGROUND: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation has been demonstrated to relieve upper airway obstruction acutely, but its effect on obstructive sleep apnea is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the response in obstructive sleep apnea to electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. METHODS: Eight patients with obstructive sleep apnea were implanted with a device that stimulated the hypoglossal nerve unilaterally during inspiration. Sleep and breathing patterns were examined at baseline before implantation and after implantation at 1, 3, and 6 months and last follow-up. RESULTS: Unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation decreased the severity of obstructive sleep apnea throughout the entire study period. Specifically, stimulation significantly reduced the mean apnea-hypopnea indices in non-rapid eye movement (mean +/- SD episodes per hour, 52.0 +/- 20.4 for baseline nights and 22.6 +/- 12.1 for stimulation nights; P<.001) and rapid eye movement (48.2 +/- 30.5 and 16.6 +/- 17.1, respectively; P<.001) sleep and reduced the severity of oxyhemoglobin desaturations. With improvement in sleep apnea, a trend toward deeper stages of non-rapid eye movement sleep was observed. Moreover, all patients tolerated long-term stimulation at night and did not experience any adverse effects from stimulation. Even after completing the study protocol, the 3 patients who remained free from stimulator malfunction continued to use this device as primary treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the feasibility and therapeutic potential for hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea.
Authors: Alan R Schwartz; Maree Barnes; David Hillman; Atul Malhotra; Eric Kezirian; Philip L Smith; Thomas Hoegh; Daniel Parrish; Peter R Eastwood Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Julian P Saboisky; Jane E Butler; David K McKenzie; Robert B Gorman; John A Trinder; David P White; Simon C Gandevia Journal: J Physiol Date: 2007-10-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Patrick J Strollo; M Boyd Gillespie; Ryan J Soose; Joachim T Maurer; Nico de Vries; Jason Cornelius; Ronald D Hanson; Tapan A Padhya; David L Steward; B Tucker Woodson; Johan Verbraecken; Olivier M Vanderveken; Mark G Goetting; Neil Feldman; Frédéric Chabolle; M Safwan Badr; Winfried Randerath; Kingman P Strohl Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 5.849