Literature DB >> 11587454

Methods for quantification of coronary artery calcifications with electron beam and conventional CT and pushing the spiral CT envelope: new cardiac applications.

C R Becker1, U J Schoepf, M F Reiser.   

Abstract

Detection of coronary artery calcifications with slice by slice prospective ECG triggering is feasible with electron beam CT as well as with single and multi-row-detector CT (MDCT). The radiation exposure to the patient to obtain comparable image quality is similar for all three modalities utilizing this prospective acquisition technique. Alternatively, coronary screening can be performed by MDCT with retrospective EKG spiral gating. Radiation exposure to the patient with this technique is significantly higher than with prospective triggering. Nevertheless, acquisition of the entire volume of the heart with retrospective gating holds promise to improve reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements, especially in patients with a low amount of coronary calcium and in patients with atrial fibrillation. If retrospective gating is used for CT angiography (CTA) with MDCT this allows to use thin slices (1.25 mm) and to perform the acquisition within one breath hold period (app. 35 s). This technique is currently limited by the temporal resolution per slice (250 ms). In order to achieve diagnostic image quality the heart rate of the patient thus needs to be sufficiently low. Therefore, in cases with heart rates significantly higher than 70 beats/min betablocker have to be administered for patient preparation as long as there are no contraindications for such a regimen. Because of low image noise and high spatial resolution CTA with MDCT is able to display the entire extent of atherosclerosis allowing to visualize calcified as well as non-calcified plaques of the coronary arteries. Under clinical conditions CTA has the potential to accurately rule out or diagnose significant coronary stenoses of the proximal and mid-segments of the coronary artery tree when compared to conventional selective coronary angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11587454     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010652606254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  8 in total

1.  Helical and single-slice conventional CT versus electron beam CT for the quantification of coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  C R Becker; T F Jakobs; S Aydemir; A Becker; A Knez; U J Schoepf; R Bruening; R Haberl; M F Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation.

Authors:  H C Yoon; L E Greaser; R Mather; S Sinha; M F McNitt-Gray; J G Goldin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Use of electron-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  D A Laudon; L F Vukov; J F Breen; J A Rumberger; P C Wollan; P F Sheedy
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  T Q Callister; P Raggi; B Cooil; N J Lippolis; D J Russo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group.

Authors:  L Wexler; B Brundage; J Crouse; R Detrano; V Fuster; J Maddahi; J Rumberger; W Stanford; R White; K Taubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Variation of heart rate and electrocardiograph trigger interval during ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  S S Mao; R J Oudiz; H Bakhsheshi; S J Wang; B H Brundage
Journal:  Am J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-10

8.  Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise?

Authors:  L F Bielak; R B Kaufmann; P P Moll; C H McCollough; R S Schwartz; P F Sheedy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive imaging for assessment of calcification in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Cristina Karohl; Luis D'Marco Gascón; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  CT for imaging coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for its application.

Authors:  Bernd M Ohnesorge; Lars K Hofmann; Thomas G Flohr; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Multidetector-row cardiac CT: diagnostic value of calcium scoring and CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic, but atypical, chest pain.

Authors:  Christopher Herzog; Martina Britten; Joern O Balzer; M G Mack; Stefan Zangos; Hanns Ackermann; Volker Schaechinger; Stefan Schaller; Thomas Flohr; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A new approach to the assessment of lumen visibility of coronary artery stent at various heart rates using 64-slice MDCT.

Authors:  J M Groen; M J W Greuter; P M A van Ooijen; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Postangioplasty restenosis followed with magnetic resonance imaging in an atherosclerotic rabbit model.

Authors:  Mari Hänni; Olli Leppänen; Orjan Smedby
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.