Literature DB >> 11587017

Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the "niche" in the scar.

A Monteagudo1, C Carreno, I E Timor-Tritsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To apply an existing diagnostic imaging test (saline infusion sonohysterography) to characterize the "filling defect" of a previous cervical cesarean delivery scar in the nonpregnant uterus.
METHODS: Forty-four patients with histories of cesarean delivery who underwent saline infusion sonohysterography for a variety of gynecologic indications were included. During the procedure, the area below the bladder recess was examined using transvaginal sonography. A filling defect or "niche" was defined as a triangular anechoic structure at the presumed site of a previous cesarean delivery scar. The depth of the niche was measured. Uterine size, the presence of fibroids and polyps, and the number of previous cesarean deliveries were noted.
RESULTS: All patients had a niche indenting the anterior uterine-cervical wall. The mean +/- SD depth of the niche was 6.17 +/- 3.6 mm. There was no correlation between the number of cesarean deliveries and the depth of the niche. Thirty-six percent of our patients had fibroids, and 18% had endometrial polyps.
CONCLUSION: Saline infusion sonohysterography was able to detect filling defects in women who previously had cesarean deliveries. We hope that by focusing our attention on the transvaginal sonographic appearance of the detectable uterine scar (niche) with or without the use of saline infusion sonohysterography in the nonpregnant uterus, it will train our eyes to look for the scar in the pregnant uterus. In addition, our study patients had a high prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding. The role of the cesarean delivery scar in women with unscheduled bleeding needs to be further evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11587017     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  21 in total

1.  Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.

Authors:  Eiji Ryo; Rina Sakurai; Hideo Kamata; Michiharu Seto; Masayoshi Morita; Takuya Ayabe
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.

Authors:  Xingchen Zhou; Tao Zhang; Huayuan Qiao; Yi Zhang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Laparoscopic correction of the uterine muscle loss in the scar after a Caesarean section delivery.

Authors:  Michał Ciebiera; Grzegorz Jakiel; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Successful management of a cesarean scar defect with dehiscence of the uterine incision by using wound lavage.

Authors:  Akinori Ida; Yoko Kubota; Maiko Nosaka; Koichi Ito; Hiroshi Kato; Yoshiyuki Tsuji
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-06

5.  Successful treatment of atypical cesarean scar defect using endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Hirotaka Masuda; Hiroshi Uchida; Tetsuo Maruyama; Kenji Sato; Suguru Sato; Mamoru Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Caesarean section scar ectopic pregnancy: a new problem or new name for an old one?

Authors:  Davor Jurkovic
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  Catastrophic consequences of a caesarean scar pregnancy missed on ultrasound.

Authors:  Kelly Collins; Alka Kothari
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

8.  Outcomes of Laparoscopic Treatment in Women with Cesarean Scar Syndrome.

Authors:  Erik Dosedla; Pavel Calda
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-08-22

9.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Ectopic Pregnancy in caesarean section scar: A case report.

Authors:  Rajarshi Aich; Narayan Solanki; Ketan Kakadiya; Ashank Bansal; Manisha Joshi; Ajita Nawale
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.