Literature DB >> 11586211

Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases.

H Lepor1, A M Nieder, M N Ferrandino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We critically examined the intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with radical retropubic prostatectomy in the modern era.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 18, 1994 and July 13, 2000, 1,000 men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon. The whole inpatient hospital medical record of 909 patients, the outpatient charts of 955 and a self-administered patient survey completed by 679 were reviewed by 2 data managers not involved in surgical management or followup care. In all 1,000 cases at least 1 of the 3 data sources was reviewed.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60.3 years. In 73%, 99.8% and 95.7% of cases serum prostate specific antigen was 10 ng./ml. or less, disease was clinical stage T1 or T2 and Gleason score was 7 or less, respectively, while 19.9% of pathological specimens showed positive margins. There were 8 intraoperative complications (0.8%). All 5 rectal injuries and the single ureteral injury were detected during the initial surgical procedure and repaired without sequelae. Only 14 men (1.4%) had any other complications during hospitalization. Until postoperative day 30, 4 pulmonary emboli (0.4%) with or without deep vein thrombosis and 5 myocardial infarctions (0.5%) developed. There were no intraoperative or in-hospital postoperative deaths and only 1 postoperative death secondary to myocardial infarction during the initial 30 days. Reexploration was done for hemorrhage and a disrupted anastomosis in 3 and 2 cases, respectively. Mean hospitalization was 2.3 days, 9.7% of patients required allogenic blood transfusion and 15 (1.5%) were rehospitalized.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series represents a rigorous assessment of the complications associated with radical retropubic prostatectomy. It shows that in the hands of an experienced urological surgeon, this procedure is associated with minimal intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. Of the patients 98% had no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Our series enables appropriate contemporary comparisons to be made with laparoscopic prostatectomy and radiation therapy. This outcomes analysis implies that radical retropubic prostatectomy cannot be assumed to have greater morbidity than radiation therapy and it sets a high standard for those advocating laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11586211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  49 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre De La Taille; Leif E Olsson; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  [Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  U Michl; M Graefen; J Noldus; T Eggert; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The effect of annual surgical caseload on the rates of in-hospital pneumonia and other in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jan Schmitges; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Marco Bianchi; Maxine Sun; Firas Abdollah; Sascha A Ahyai; Claudio Jeldres; Thomas Steuber; Paul Perrotte; Shahrokh F Shariat; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): prevention and management.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Benjamin Lee; Michael C Truss; Alan McNeill; Martin Burchardt; Udo Jonas; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a brief review of outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew D Shuford
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-10

8.  Perioperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a comparison with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xu-Dong Yao; Xiao-Jun Liu; Shi-Lin Zhang; Bo Dai; Hai-Liang Zhang; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Enrique Ian S Lorenzo; Wooju Jeong; Cheol Kyu Oh; Ho Song Yu; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-01-21

Review 10.  Prevention and management of ureteral injuries occurring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Heilbronn experience and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Ali Serdar Gözen; Joanne Cresswell; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Faruk Yencilek; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.