Literature DB >> 11586154

A new cervical spine clearance protocol using computed tomography.

C A Barba1, J Taggert, A S Morgan, J Guerra, B Bernstein, M Lorenzo, A Gershon, N Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess a cervical spine clearance protocol for blunt trauma patients using helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of the cervical spine (C-spine).
METHODS: A protocol using CT scan of the C-spine was implemented and the first 6 months of use reviewed. Patients requiring a CT scan of the head had the C-spine evaluated by lateral C-spine radiography and a helical CT scan. Patients without indication for CT scan of the head had the C-spine evaluated by three-view radiography (anteroposterior, lateral, and odontoid) with selective CT scan of the C-spine for imaging areas not well visualized or those with abnormalities identified by radiography or by clinical examination alone.
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-four patients were admitted to the trauma center after blunt trauma during the first 6 months of protocol implementation. Head CT scans were obtained in 158 patients and lateral cervical spine radiography in conjunction with helical CT scanning evaluated the C-spine. The other 166 patients had the cervical spine cleared by three-view radiography series or by clinical examination alone. For patients in whom a head CT scan was not indicated, CT scanning was used only when plain radiographs failed to adequately visualize the entire C-spine. A total of 15 injuries (4.6% of the group) were detected. Seven injuries were suspected or detected by lateral plain radiographs and confirmed by CT scan. Six patients had an injury not detected by radiography but diagnosed by CT scan, and one patient had a false-positive radiograph. Of the remaining two injuries, one was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging and the other by CT scan outside of the protocol. Lateral plain radiographs alone failed to detect 46% (n = 6) of all injuries.
CONCLUSION: In our series, the selective use of helical CT scanning with plain radiography increased the accuracy with which cervical spine injury was detected from 54% to 100%. The protocol allowed for more rapid evaluation in many patients as well. We recommend that practice guidelines include the use of helical CT scan of the entire C-spine as the diagnostic procedure for those blunt trauma patients undergoing CT scanning of the head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11586154     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200110000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  9 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: Spinal imaging for the adult obtunded blunt trauma patient: update from 2004.

Authors:  James O M Plumb; C G Morris
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Evidence based diagnostic procedures for the determination of suspected blunt cervical spine injuries. Development of an algorithm].

Authors:  B A Leidel; K-G Kanz; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients.

Authors:  Bonnie McCracken; Eric Klineberg; Brian Pickard; David H Wisner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Interactive effect of acute pain and motor learning acquisition on sensorimotor integration and motor learning outcomes.

Authors:  Erin Dancey; Bernadette Murphy; Danielle Andrew; Paul Yielder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Utility of helical computed tomography in differentiating unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations.

Authors:  Andrew T Dailey; Christopher I Shaffrey; Raja Rampersaud; Joonyung Lee; Darrel S Brodke; Paul Arnold; Ahmad Nassr; James S Harrop; Jonathan Grauer; Christopher M Bono; Marcel Dvorak; Alexander Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Hidden discoligamentous instability in cervical spine injuries: can quantitative motion analysis improve detection?

Authors:  M Mayer; J Zenner; A Auffarth; M Blocher; M Figl; H Resch; H Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cervical spine computed tomography imaging artifact affecting clinical decision-making in the traumatized patient.

Authors:  Aaron C Coats; Matthew S Nies; David Rispler
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-10-17

8.  Ability of magnetic resonance imaging to accurately determine alar ligament integrity in patients with atlanto-occipital injuries.

Authors:  Adam R Dyas; Thomas E Niemeier; Gerald Mcgwin; Steven M Theiss
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 9.  Risks associated with magnetic resonance imaging and cervical collar in comatose, blunt trauma patients with negative comprehensive cervical spine computed tomography and no apparent spinal deficit.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Brian P Brocker; B David Collier; David J Gemmel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.