Literature DB >> 11585185

Keeping quality on the policy agenda.

E A McGlynn1, R H Brook.   

Abstract

Quality of care in the United States and elsewhere consistently fails to meet established standards. These failures subject patients to premature death and needless suffering. Yet, unlike the experience with other threats to life (tire failures or airplane rudders), public and private policymakers have been unable to maintain sufficient interest in identifying and solving problems with quality to change the way in which care is delivered. We discuss why it is hard to keep quality on the policy agenda and suggest short-term steps that are necessary if quality is to improve here and in the rest of the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11585185     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  7 in total

1.  Medical guidelines, physician density, and quality of care: evidence from German SHARE data.

Authors:  Hendrik Jürges; Vincent Pohl
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-12-28

2.  From adversary to partner: have quality improvement organizations made the transition?

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Melissa D A Carlson; William T Gallo; Jeanne Scinto; Miriam K Campbell; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Accuracy of hospital report cards based on administrative data.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Andrew W Dick; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Conceptualizing a quality plan for healthcare. A philosophical reflection on the relevance of the health profession to society.

Authors:  S Mehrdad Mohammadi; S Farzad Mohammadi; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

Review 5.  Affordable Care Act: implications in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  How safe is the safety paradigm?

Authors:  O A Arah; N S Klazinga
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-06

Review 7.  Many quality measurements, but few quality measures assessing the quality of breast cancer care in women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Howard M Schachter; Vasil Mamaladze; Gabriela Lewin; Ian D Graham; Melissa Brouwers; Margaret Sampson; Andra Morrison; Li Zhang; Peter O'Blenis; Chantelle Garritty
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.