Literature DB >> 11584783

Acceptability of the female condom in different groups of women in South Africa--a multicentred study to inform the national female condom introductory strategy.

M E Beksinska1, V H Rees, J A McIntyre, D Wilkinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the acceptability of the female condom to different groups of women and their partners in South Africa.
DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Multicentre study conducted in five sites.
SUBJECTS: The study recruited 678 women from five centres to an acceptability trial of the female condom. Acceptability and successful use varied between the centres. OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors affecting successful use and willingness and intention to use the method again.
RESULTS: In total, 209 women used the condom at least once. Discontinuation rates were high, with partner reluctance to try the method as the main reason given for discontinuation at all sites. Women who had previous experience with the male condom or who received a more intensive training session generally found the device easier to use. The main issues concerning women were over-lubrication (27%) and concern that the device was too large (28%). The majority of women said that they would be interested in using the method again (86%) and would recommend it to friends (95%).
CONCLUSIONS: Overcoming partner opposition is an important issue to address when introducing the method. The study was used to address the national introductory strategy of the female condom, which began in 1998.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11584783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Med J


  16 in total

1.  The acceptability of reuse of the female condom among urban South African women.

Authors:  A E Pettifor; M E Beksinska; H V Rees; N Mqoqi; K E Dickson-Tetteh
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Willingness to use microbicides is affected by the importance of product characteristics, use parameters, and protective properties.

Authors:  Kathleen M Morrow; Joseph L Fava; Rochelle K Rosen; Sara Vargas; Candelaria Barroso; Anna L Christensen; Cynthia Woodsong; Lawrence Severy
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  The promises and limitations of female-initiated methods of HIV/STI protection.

Authors:  Joanne E Mantell; Shari L Dworkin; Theresa M Exner; Susie Hoffman; Jenni A Smit; Ida Susser
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Multilevel social influences on female condom use and adoption among women in the urban United States.

Authors:  Margaret R Weeks; Helena Hilario; Jianghong Li; Emil Coman; Maryann Abbott; Laurie Sylla; Michelle Corbett; Julia Dickson-Gomez
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.078

5.  Health care providers: a missing link in understanding acceptability of the female condom.

Authors:  Joanne E Mantell; Brooke S West; Kimberly Sue; Susie Hoffman; Theresa M Exner; Elizabeth Kelvin; Zena A Stein
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2011-02

Review 6.  Progress and challenges to male and female condom use in South Africa.

Authors:  Mags E Beksinska; Jennifer A Smit; Joanne E Mantell
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 7.  Preventing HIV infection in women: a global health imperative.

Authors:  Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Sengeziwe Sibeko; Cheryl Baxter
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Building young women's knowledge and skills in female condom use: lessons learned from a South African intervention.

Authors:  A C Schuyler; T B Masvawure; J A Smit; M Beksinska; Z Mabude; C Ngoloyi; J E Mantell
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2016-03-08

9.  High-risk women's willingness to try a simulated vaginal microbicide: results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Katie E Mosack; Margaret R Weeks; Laurie Novick Sylla; Maryann Abbott
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2005

10.  Willingness to use microbicides varies by race/ethnicity, experience with prevention products, and partner type.

Authors:  Kathleen M Morrow; Joseph L Fava; Rochelle K Rosen; Anna L Christensen; Sara Vargas; Candelaria Barroso
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.