Literature DB >> 11584459

Ventricular endocardial right bifocal stimulation in the treatment of severe dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure with wide QRS.

J C Pachón1, E I Pachón, R N Albornoz, J C Pachón1, D S Kormann, V M Gimenes, P T Medeiros, M A Silva, J E Sousa, P P Paulista, L C Souza, A D Jatene.   

Abstract

The QRS widening by ventricular conventional pacing impairs the systolic and diastolic functions and increases mitral regurgitation. The aim of this study was to compare conventional pacing to an alternative stimulation mode with a narrower QRS using two leads in the RV. Thirty-nine (25 men, 14 women; mean age 60.1 +/- 15.1 years) dilated cardiomyopathy patients (Chagas' disease [n = 17], coronariopathy [n = 9], AV ablation for tachycardiomyopathy [n = 3], and other [n = 10]) with cardiac failure (NYHA 3.1 +/- 0.8), pacemaker indication, and chronic AV block (22 AF) had endocardial pacemaker implantations (27 Biotronik, 12 Guidant). Two RV leads (one septal, one conventional [RV apex] were connected, respectively, to the atrial and ventricular pacemaker plugs. After clinical stabilization they were studied under three stimulation modes in the same session: AAI (septal), VVI (conventional), and ventricular endocardial right bifocal stimulation (VERBS) (DDT/DVI/DDD = AV interval = 15/10 ms). In comparison to conventional pacing, VERBS increased ejection fraction (0.124), cardiac output (19.5%), and peak filling rate (31.0%), and decreased QRS duration (24.7%), left atrium area (11.9%), mitral regurgitation area (32.3%), the diastolic transmitral flow (E/A relation) (19.3%), and the propagation flow time (18.0%) from the mitral valve to the left ventricular apex (tE_col), (P < 0.05). The quality-of-life showed an impressive score reduction of 50.4%. The septal stimulation alone showed a less expressive benefit. In severe dilated cardiomyopathy with classic pacemaker indication, VERBS showed significantly better performance than the septal or the conventional stimulation alone. There was a good systolic and a remarkable diastolic improvement causing an important reduction in the quality-of-life score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11584459     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01369.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the acute hemodynamic effect of right ventricular apex, outflow tract, and dual-site right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Andrzej Rubaj; Piotr Rucinski; Tomasz Sodolski; Andrzej Bilan; Marcin Gulaj; Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Future easy and physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-26

Review 3.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

Review 4.  [Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

5.  Bifocal right ventricular pacing: an alternative way to achieve resynchronization when left ventricular lead insertion is unsuccessful.

Authors:  Skevos Sideris; Constantina Aggeli; Emmanouil Poulidakis; Kostas Gatzoulis; Ioannis Vlaseros; Katerina Avgeropoulou; Ioannis Felekos; Ilias Sotiropoulos; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Ioannis Kallikazaros
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Outcome of right ventricular bifocal pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and severe dilated cardiomiopathy due to Chagas disease: three years of follow-up.

Authors:  Antonio da Silva Menezes
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?

Authors:  Andrés Di Leoni Ferrari; Anibal Pires Borges; Luciano Cabral Albuquerque; Carolina Pelzer Sussenbach; Priscila Raupp da Rosa; Ricardo Medeiros Piantá; Mario Wiehe; Marco Antônio Goldani
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

8.  Ventricular Synchrony in Para-Hisian Cardiac Pacing as an Alternative for Physiological Cardiac Activation (Indirect Recruitment of the His Bundle?).

Authors:  Andres Di Leoni Ferrari; Guilherme Ferreira Gazzoni; Luis Manuel Ley Domingues; Jessica Caroline Feltrin Willes; Gustavo Chiari Cabral; Flavio Vinicius Costa Ferreira; Laura Orlandini Lodi; Gustavo Reis
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Permanent parahisian pacing.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.