PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate CT findings of pathologically proven intrapulmonary lymph nodes (IPLNs) and discuss the utility of thin-section CT and contrast-enhanced CT. METHOD: CT findings of 18 nodules in 14 patients with pathologically proven IPLNs were reviewed. CT scanning of the whole lung was performed contiguously with slice thickness of 10 mm. In addition, a helical scan with slice thickness of 2 mm was performed in nine patients, focusing on the nodule. Contrast-enhanced helical CT was performed in four patients, and the utility of thin section CT and contrast-enhanced CT was investigated. RESULTS: One patient had three nodules, 2 patients had two nodules, and the remaining 11 patients had a solitary nodule. All nodules were located below the level of the carina and within 15 mm of the pleura. In one case, conventional CT revealed the nodule 20 mm away from the pleura; however, the nodule attached to the major fissure was clearly revealed on thin-section CT. The size of the nodules was < or =15 mm, and the shape was round (n = 8), oval (n = 9), or lobulated (n = 1) with sharp border. One nodule demonstrated a spiculated border due to a surrounding pulmonary fibrosis on conventional CT; however, thin-section CT showed precisely a sharp border. The lobulated shape of one case histopathologically reflected a hilus of lymph node. On contrast-enhanced helical CT, all four nodules were enhanced and the degree enhancement was 36-85 HU (median 66.6 HU). CONCLUSION: In current times, IPLNs are not uncommon lesions. We should consider IPLN in the differential diagnosis of solitary or multiple pulmonary nodules in the peripheral field and below the level of the carina. Thin-section CT showed precisely the border or relation between IPLNs and the surrounding structure. It was difficult to distinguish between IPLNs and malignant nodules from the degree of enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT. On thin-section and contrast-enhanced CT, the findings of IPLNs are not necessarily specific. Therefore, strict observation on CT is necessary; in certain cases that are increasing in size, video-assisted thoracic surgery should be considered because of their location.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate CT findings of pathologically proven intrapulmonary lymph nodes (IPLNs) and discuss the utility of thin-section CT and contrast-enhanced CT. METHOD: CT findings of 18 nodules in 14 patients with pathologically proven IPLNs were reviewed. CT scanning of the whole lung was performed contiguously with slice thickness of 10 mm. In addition, a helical scan with slice thickness of 2 mm was performed in nine patients, focusing on the nodule. Contrast-enhanced helical CT was performed in four patients, and the utility of thin section CT and contrast-enhanced CT was investigated. RESULTS: One patient had three nodules, 2 patients had two nodules, and the remaining 11 patients had a solitary nodule. All nodules were located below the level of the carina and within 15 mm of the pleura. In one case, conventional CT revealed the nodule 20 mm away from the pleura; however, the nodule attached to the major fissure was clearly revealed on thin-section CT. The size of the nodules was < or =15 mm, and the shape was round (n = 8), oval (n = 9), or lobulated (n = 1) with sharp border. One nodule demonstrated a spiculated border due to a surrounding pulmonary fibrosis on conventional CT; however, thin-section CT showed precisely a sharp border. The lobulated shape of one case histopathologically reflected a hilus of lymph node. On contrast-enhanced helical CT, all four nodules were enhanced and the degree enhancement was 36-85 HU (median 66.6 HU). CONCLUSION: In current times, IPLNs are not uncommon lesions. We should consider IPLN in the differential diagnosis of solitary or multiple pulmonary nodules in the peripheral field and below the level of the carina. Thin-section CT showed precisely the border or relation between IPLNs and the surrounding structure. It was difficult to distinguish between IPLNs and malignant nodules from the degree of enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT. On thin-section and contrast-enhanced CT, the findings of IPLNs are not necessarily specific. Therefore, strict observation on CT is necessary; in certain cases that are increasing in size, video-assisted thoracic surgery should be considered because of their location.
Authors: Anton Schreuder; Colin Jacobs; Ernst T Scholten; Mathias Prokop; Bram van Ginneken; David A Lynch; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop Journal: PeerJ Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Onno M Mets; Kaman Chung; Ernst Th Scholten; Wouter B Veldhuis; M Prokop; Bram van Ginneken; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Pim A de Jong Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 5.315