Literature DB >> 11584194

Predicting polyposis severity by proctoscopy: how reliable is it?

J Church1, C Burke, E McGannon, O Pastean, B Clark.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis need prophylactic colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy. Preoperative rectal polyp counts have been used as one factor to determine which operation should be done, triaging patients according to risk of rectal cancer or completion proctectomy after ileorectal anastomosis. This study was designed to examine the reliability of preoperative proctoscopy in predicting familial adenomatous polyposis severity and outcome after ileorectal anastomosis.
METHODS: Familial adenomatous polyposis patients were categorized according to preoperative proctoscopy as follows: Group 1, 5 or fewer adenomas; Group 2, 6 to 19 adenomas; Group 3, 20 or more adenomas. Familial adenomatous polyposis severity was defined as mild if there were < 1,000 polyps in the colon at colectomy and severe if there were > 1,000 polyps.
RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were reviewed, 80 in Group 1, 59 in Group 2, and 74 in Group 3. There was no difference among the groups in mean age at presentation. Patients with fewer than five rectal adenomas were predominately females. They rarely had symptoms (22.8 percent), had mostly mild polyposis (86.5 percent), and in 74 of 80 cases underwent ileorectal anastomosis. Only six underwent restorative proctocolectomy. Of those having an ileorectal anastomosis, five needed later proctectomy, none for cancer. Patients with 6 to 19 rectal polyps were a similar group to those with 5 or fewer. Most were asymptomatic (67.8 percent), most had mild polyposis (81.6 percent), and 54 of 59 underwent ileorectal anastomosis (5 had restorative proctocolectomy). Only 3 of the 54 having ileorectal anastomosis needed subsequent proctectomy, 2 for rectal cancer. The patients with 20 or more rectal polyps were different. They usually presented with symptoms (86 percent), the majority (56.6 percent) had severe polyposis, and only 50 percent (37/74) underwent ileorectal anastomosis, the other half having restorative proctocolectomy. Of the 37 patients with an ileorectal anastomosis, 13 needed later proctectomy (35.1 percent), 4 for cancer (10.8 percent).
CONCLUSION: Fewer than five rectal adenomas at presentation almost always predicts mild disease, and patients do well after ileorectal anastomosis. Twenty or more adenomas usually means severe disease. Patients with 6 to 19 adenomas are often mildly affected, but their phenotype is less benign than that of patients with fewer than five polyps. Although not foolproof, proctoscopy is a useful test in triaging patients with familial adenomatous polyposis according to disease severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11584194     DOI: 10.1007/bf02234779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  Controversies in the surgery of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  James M Church
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  In which patients do I perform IRA, and why?

Authors:  James Church
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  How does genome sequencing impact surgery?

Authors:  Marlies S Reimers; Charla C Engels; Peter J K Kuppen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Gerrit J Liefers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Inherited Polyposis Syndromes.

Authors:  Daniel Herzig; Karin Hardiman; Martin Weiser; Nancy You; Ian Paquette; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Subsequent Adenomas of Ileal Pouch and Anorectal Segment after Prophylactic Surgery for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  A E M'Koma; A J Herline; S E Adunyah
Journal:  World J Colorectal Surg       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

8.  Colonic adenomatous polyposis syndromes: clinical management.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

9.  Rectal and pouch recurrences after surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Fabio Guilherme Campos; Antonio Rocco Imperiale; Víctor Edmond Seid; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Afonso Henrique da Silva e Sousa; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Adenocarcinomas After Prophylactic Surgery For Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Joan C Smith; Michael W Schäffer; Billy R Ballard; Duane T Smoot; Alan J Herline; Samuel E Adunyah; Amosy E M'Koma
Journal:  J Cancer Ther       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.