M M Silveri1, L P Spear. 1. Department of Psychology and Center for Developmental Psychobiology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to the motor-impairing and hypnotic effects of ethanol (EtOH) increases notably during development. Less is known, however, about the ontogeny of EtOH tolerance and the ontogenetic relationship among different types of tolerance. Consequently, we compared the ontogenetic development of acute, rapid, and chronic tolerance to EtOH-induced motor impairment and hypothermia in a swim task. METHODS: Preweanling, adolescent, and adult female and male Sprague-Dawley rats were given chronic saline (control group), five daily EtOH exposures before EtOH on test day (chronic group), one EtOH exposure before test day (rapid group), or EtOH exposure only on test day (acute groups). Separate groups of animals in the acute groups were tested at 15, 60, or 105 min after injection to estimate acute tolerance development via calculating slopes of the linear regression of impairment relative to brain alcohol levels at each postinjection interval. Initial EtOH perturbation of swim performance was equated across age by varying EtOH dose. RESULTS: Acute tolerance was evident to the motor-impairing effects of EtOH at all ages. When impairment was indexed relative to brain alcohol levels, rapid and chronic tolerance to the motor-impairing effects of EtOH on latency to reach the start was seen across age, although this tolerance tended to be more pronounced in adults. Somewhat different ontogenetic patterns of tolerance development were observed with EtOH-induced hypothermia, a dependent measure for which EtOH perturbation was not equated across age. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of initial perturbation by EtOH seems to be an important predictor of tolerance expression during ontogeny. That is, ontogenetic profiles of tolerance development differ significantly when EtOH-induced motor impairment is equated across age rather than dose of EtOH administered. The role of target response measures and context stress should also be considered when exploring ontogenetic expression of EtOH tolerance.
BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to the motor-impairing and hypnotic effects of ethanol (EtOH) increases notably during development. Less is known, however, about the ontogeny of EtOH tolerance and the ontogenetic relationship among different types of tolerance. Consequently, we compared the ontogenetic development of acute, rapid, and chronic tolerance to EtOH-induced motor impairment and hypothermia in a swim task. METHODS: Preweanling, adolescent, and adult female and male Sprague-Dawley rats were given chronic saline (control group), five daily EtOH exposures before EtOH on test day (chronic group), one EtOH exposure before test day (rapid group), or EtOH exposure only on test day (acute groups). Separate groups of animals in the acute groups were tested at 15, 60, or 105 min after injection to estimate acute tolerance development via calculating slopes of the linear regression of impairment relative to brain alcohol levels at each postinjection interval. Initial EtOH perturbation of swim performance was equated across age by varying EtOH dose. RESULTS: Acute tolerance was evident to the motor-impairing effects of EtOH at all ages. When impairment was indexed relative to brain alcohol levels, rapid and chronic tolerance to the motor-impairing effects of EtOH on latency to reach the start was seen across age, although this tolerance tended to be more pronounced in adults. Somewhat different ontogenetic patterns of tolerance development were observed with EtOH-induced hypothermia, a dependent measure for which EtOH perturbation was not equated across age. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of initial perturbation by EtOH seems to be an important predictor of tolerance expression during ontogeny. That is, ontogenetic profiles of tolerance development differ significantly when EtOH-induced motor impairment is equated across age rather than dose of EtOH administered. The role of target response measures and context stress should also be considered when exploring ontogenetic expression of EtOH tolerance.
Authors: Ricardo Marcos Pautassi; Mallory Myers; Linda Patia Spear; Juan Carlos Molina; Norman E Spear Journal: Alcohol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.405