Literature DB >> 11583862

Prospective crossover comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure.

C Maack1, T Elter, G Nickenig, K LaRosee, M Crivaro, A Stäblein, H Wuttke, M Böhm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the effects of a change of beta-adrenergic blocking agent treatment from metoprolol to carvedilol and vice versa in patients with heart failure (HF).
BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers improve ventricular function and prolong survival in patients with HF. It has recently been suggested that carvedilol has more pronounced effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with metoprolol. It is uncertain whether a change from one beta-blocker to the other is safe and leads to any change of left ventricular function.
METHODS: Forty-four patients with HF due to ischemic (n = 17) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (n = 27) that had responded well to long-term treatment with either metoprolol (n = 20) or carvedilol (n = 24) were switched to an equivalent dose of the respective other beta-blocker. Before and six months after crossover of treatment, echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and dobutamine stress echocardiography were performed.
RESULTS: Six months after crossover of beta-blocker treatment, LVEF had further improved with both carvedilol and metoprolol (carvedilol: 32 +/- 3% to 36 +/- 4%; metoprolol: 27 +/- 4% to 30 +/- 5%; both p < 0.05 vs. baseline), without interindividual differences. There were no changes in either New York Heart Association functional class or any other hemodynamic parameters at rest. Dobutamine stress echocardiography revealed a more pronounced increase of heart rate after dobutamine infusion in metoprolol- compared with carvedilol-treated patients. After dobutamine infusion, LVEF increased in the carvedilol- but not in the metoprolol-treated group.
CONCLUSIONS: When switching treatment from one beta-blocker to the other, improvement of LVEF in patients with HF is maintained. Despite similar long-term effects on hemodynamics at rest, beta-adrenergic responsiveness is different in both treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11583862     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01471-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  Anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effects of beta blockers in a canine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy: comparison between carvedilol and metoprolol.

Authors:  D Elizabeth Le; Marco Pascotto; Howard Leong-Poi; Ibrahim Sari; Antonio Micari; Sanjiv Kaul
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 17.165

2.  Predicting maximal HR in heart failure patients on β-blockade therapy.

Authors:  Steven J Keteyian; Dalane Kitzman; Faiez Zannad; Joel Landzberg; J Malcolm Arnold; Peter Brubaker; Clinton A Brawner; Daniel Bensimhon; Anne S Hellkamp; Greg Ewald
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Association between resting heart rate, chronotropic index, and long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure receiving β-blocker therapy: data from the HF-ACTION trial.

Authors:  Daniela Dobre; Faiez Zannad; Steven J Keteyian; Susanna R Stevens; Patrick Rossignol; Dalane W Kitzman; Joel Landzberg; Jonathan Howlett; William E Kraus; Stephen J Ellis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Beta-adrenergic Receptor Blockers in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Wendy M. Book; Brenda J. Hott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2003-12

5.  Different responses to dobutamine in the presence of carvedilol or metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  E Bollano; M Scharin Täng; A Hjalmarson; F Waagstein; B Andersson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.