Literature DB >> 11583607

Diagnosis of occlusal caries: Part II. Recent diagnostic technologies.

L E Tam1, D McComb.   

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of the presence or absence of disease is a fundamental requirement in health care. The diagnosis of non-overt occlusal decay is challenging and can be highly subjective, and its inherent uncertainties can lead to widely differing treatment decisions. The purpose of this 2-part paper is to review current knowledge concerning conventional and new diagnostic methods for occlusal caries. Part I looked at established methods for diagnosing occlusal decay. These methods have several limitations, particularly in their ability to diagnose early carious lesions. Part II examines new and emerging technologies that are being developed for the diagnosis of occlusal decay. Electrical conductance measurements and quantitative laser- or light-induced fluorescence represent significant improvements over conventional diagnostic methods, especially for in vitro applications and particularly with regard to sensitivity and reproducibility. Proponents of the DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence system claim that it evaluates the fluorescence that develops when laser light is incident on areas of demineralization. This noninvasive device is simple to use and provides quantitative data. Studies supporting its validity are limited but do suggest good sensitivity and excellent reproducibility. However, the DIAGNOdent system requires more scientific scrutiny. Although it offers a high rate of disease detection, it has little ability to indicate the extent of decay. In all treatment decisions, clinicians must be aware of the limitations of the diagnostic methods that have been used. Clinical judgment based on the patient s case history, visual cues, review of radiographs and probability of disease is still the most important aspect of optimum patient care. New technologies may provide supplemental information, but they cannot yet replace established methods for the diagnosis of occlusal caries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11583607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0709-8936            Impact factor:   1.316


  12 in total

1.  Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries.

Authors:  S Rathore; D Tyndall; Jt Wright; E Everett
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.

Authors:  B Senel; K Kamburoglu; O Uçok; S P Yüksel; T Ozen; H Avsever
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  In vivo comparison of laser fluorescence measurements with conventional methods for occlusal caries detection.

Authors:  Meryem Toraman Alkurt; Ilkay Peker; Hacer Deniz Arisu; Oya Bala; Bülent Altunkaynak
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Evaluation of Accuracy of DIAGNOdent in Diagnosis of Primary and Secondary Caries in Comparison to Conventional Methods.

Authors:  Hanieh Nokhbatolfoghahaie; Marzieh Alikhasi; Nasim Chiniforush; Farzaneh Khoei; Nassimeh Safavi; Behnoush Yaghoub Zadeh
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

5.  Current status of dental caries diagnosis using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Jin-Soo Ahn; Ho-Beom Kwon; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2011-06-23

6.  Transillumination and optical coherence tomography for the detection and diagnosis of enamel caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Richard Hogan; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-27

7.  Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries.

Authors:  Patrick A Fee; Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Patrick A Fee; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-08

9.  Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Lucy O'Malley; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-14

10.  Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.

Authors:  Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.