Literature DB >> 11583429

Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows.

G Le Goff1, J Noblet.   

Abstract

Seventy-seven diets were fed to 61-kg growing pigs at a feeding level close to their ad libitum intake and to nonlactating, nonpregnant sows slightly above their maintenance energy level (2.4 kg/d). The main objectives of this study were to compare the total tract digestibility of dietary energy or nutrients of the 77 diets in growing pigs and adult sows and to analyze the effect of diet chemical composition on total tract digestibility in both groups of pigs. Diets were formulated to represent a range of chemical compositions as large as those found in most practical situations. The DE and ME values and total tract digestible nutrient contents of diets were measured for each group of animals; each diet was measured in four to five animals per group, and collection of urine and feces lasted 10 d. The results were used to establish equations for predicting DE and ME values, total tract digestible nutrient contents, and total tract digestibility coefficients of energy from chemical characteristics for each group of animals. The results show that the total tract digestibility of energy or nutrients was higher (P < 0.01) in adult sows than in growing pigs; the total tract digestibility coefficients of energy, crude protein, ether extract, and NDF averaged 85.2, 85.1, 37.1, and 64.4%, respectively, for sows and 82.1, 80.3, 31.6, and 56.3%, respectively, for growing pigs. The ME/DE ratio was lower (P < 0.01) in sows (94.8%) than in growing pigs (96.5%), as a result of higher urinary energy losses in sows. The difference in DE values (on average, 0.6 MJ/kg of DM) between adult sows and growing pigs was not constant (P < 0.01) but increased with dietary fiber content (3.3, 8.6, and 10.1 kJ for each gram of NDF, ADF, and crude fiber increase in the diet, respectively), which suggests that the origin of the difference between the two physiological stages is mainly due to a higher rate of degradation of dietary fiber in the hindgut of sows. The DE and ME values could be accurately predicted from total tract digestible nutrients or from chemical characteristics for each physiological stage. Equations for predicting urinary energy loss from urinary N are also proposed. From a practical point of view, it is suggested to use two energy values for pig feeds: one applicable to growing-finishing pigs and one to adult sows. Equations for predicting DE in adult sows from energy values obtained in growing pigs are proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11583429     DOI: 10.2527/2001.7992418x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  32 in total

1.  The contribution of digestible and metabolizable energy from high-fiber dietary ingredients is not affected by inclusion rate in mixed diets fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  D M D L Navarro; E M A M Bruininx; L de Jong; H H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Insoluble dietary fiber does not affect the ability of phytase to release phosphorus from phytate in the diet of nursery pigs1.

Authors:  Jesus A Acosta; John F Patience
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Poorer lifetime growth performance of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny is largely due to weight differences at birth and reduced growth in the preweaning period, and is not improved by progeny segregation after weaning.

Authors:  J R Craig; C L Collins; K L Bunter; J J Cottrell; F R Dunshea; J R Pluske
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Interactions between sire family and production environment (temperate vs. tropical) on performance and thermoregulation responses in growing pigs.

Authors:  R Rosé; H Gilbert; T Loyau; M Giorgi; Y Billon; J Riquet; D Renaudeau; J-L Gourdine
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in canola meal fed to gestating and lactating sows1.

Authors:  Deepak Ettungapladi Velayudhan; Manik M Hossain; Hans H Stein; C Martin Nyachoti
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Nutritive value of three tropical forage legumes and their influence on growth performance, carcass traits and organ weights of pigs.

Authors:  Bienvenu Kambashi; Gaetan Kalala; Denis Dochain; Jacques Mafwila; Xavier Rollin; Christelle Boudry; Pascale Picron; Jérôme Bindelle
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Blood and faecal biomarkers to assess dietary energy, protein and amino acid efficiency of utilization by growing and finishing pigs.

Authors:  Jordi Camp Montoro; David Solà-Oriol; Ramon Muns; Josep Gasa; Núria Llanes; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-07-04

8.  Comparative digestibility of polysaccharide-complexed zinc and zinc sulfate in diets for gestating and lactating sows.

Authors:  Julia P Holen; Lee J Johnston; Pedro E Urriola; Jack E Garrett; Gerald C Shurson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine.

Authors:  Gerald C Shurson; Yuan-Tai Hung; Jae Cheol Jang; Pedro E Urriola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Estimation of endogenous intestinal losses of acid hydrolyzed ether extract in growing and finishing pigs using the linear regression method.

Authors:  Jesus A Acosta; R Dean Boyd; John F Patience
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.