D Aronsky1, D Kendall, K Merkley, B C James, P J Haug. 1. Department of Medical Informatics, LDS Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. dominik.aronsky@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a generally applicable set of coded chief complaints for the computerized patient records of emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: At an urban teaching ED the chief complaints of more than 50,000 patients were analyzed retrospectively during a 29-month period (June 1995-October 1997). Applying continuous quality improvement methods, a multidisciplinary team examined the current process documenting the patient's chief complaint. During two prospective periods (November 1997-December 1998; January 1999-June 1999), more than 34,000 chief complaints were analyzed. To reduce free-text charting practices, a variety of interventions on individual and team level were applied. Quantitative analysis was performed with statistical process control charts, and a qualitative evaluation was performed with a questionnaire. RESULTS: The charting of chief complaint in free-text format decreased from 23% to 1%. The range among individual ED staff members narrowed from 45% to 9%. During the refinement of the set of coded chief complaints, six infrequently charted items were removed. Five new chief complaints identified by analysis of free-text entries during the second study period were added. The current set of chief complaints consists of 54 codable and the three original free-text items. The ED staff members perceived all the interventions beneficial. A poster displaying all available terms as a visual aid, however, had the largest impact on charting the patient's chief complaint in coded format. CONCLUSIONS: Applying continuous quality improvement methods, the authors created a clinically developed and applicable set of codable chief complaints that can be easily integrated into a computerized patient record of an ED.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a generally applicable set of coded chief complaints for the computerized patient records of emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: At an urban teaching ED the chief complaints of more than 50,000 patients were analyzed retrospectively during a 29-month period (June 1995-October 1997). Applying continuous quality improvement methods, a multidisciplinary team examined the current process documenting the patient's chief complaint. During two prospective periods (November 1997-December 1998; January 1999-June 1999), more than 34,000 chief complaints were analyzed. To reduce free-text charting practices, a variety of interventions on individual and team level were applied. Quantitative analysis was performed with statistical process control charts, and a qualitative evaluation was performed with a questionnaire. RESULTS: The charting of chief complaint in free-text format decreased from 23% to 1%. The range among individual ED staff members narrowed from 45% to 9%. During the refinement of the set of coded chief complaints, six infrequently charted items were removed. Five new chief complaints identified by analysis of free-text entries during the second study period were added. The current set of chief complaints consists of 54 codable and the three original free-text items. The ED staff members perceived all the interventions beneficial. A poster displaying all available terms as a visual aid, however, had the largest impact on charting the patient's chief complaint in coded format. CONCLUSIONS: Applying continuous quality improvement methods, the authors created a clinically developed and applicable set of codable chief complaints that can be easily integrated into a computerized patient record of an ED.
Authors: Johan Thor; Jonas Lundberg; Jakob Ask; Jesper Olsson; Cheryl Carli; Karin Pukk Härenstam; Mats Brommels Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2007-10
Authors: Steven Horng; Nathaniel R Greenbaum; Larry A Nathanson; James C McClay; Foster R Goss; Jeffrey A Nielson Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Nicolò Caporale; Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate; Elena Nardi; Rosanna Cogliandro; Mario Cavazza; Vincenzo Stanghellini Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Jesse M Pines; Heather L Farley; Michael P Phelan; Christopher Beach; Jeremiah D Schuur; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kenneth D Mandl; J Marc Overhage; Michael M Wagner; William B Lober; Paola Sebastiani; Farzad Mostashari; Julie A Pavlin; Per H Gesteland; Tracee Treadwell; Eileen Koski; Lori Hutwagner; David L Buckeridge; Raymond D Aller; Shaun Grannis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003-11-21 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ann-Sofie Backman; Paul Blomqvist; Magdalena Lagerlund; Eva Carlsson-Holm; Johanna Adami Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.581