Literature DB >> 11579167

Apical tuft input efficacy in layer 5 pyramidal cells from rat visual cortex.

P A Rhodes1, R R Llinás.   

Abstract

1. The integration of synaptic inputs to the apical dendrite of layer 5 neocortical pyramidal cells was studied using compartment model simulations. The goal was to characterize the generation of regenerative responses to synaptic inputs under two conditions: (a) where there was an absence of background synaptic input, and (b) when the entire cell surface was subjected to a uniform blanket of synaptic background conductance such that somatic input resistance was reduced 5-fold. 2. Dendritic morphology corresponded to a layer 5 thick-trunked pyramidal cell from rat primary visual cortex at postnatal day 28 (P28), with distribution of dendritic active currents guided by the electrophysiological characteristics of the apical trunk reported in this cell type. Response characteristics for two dendritic channel distributions were compared, one of which supported Ca(2+) spikes in the apical dendrite. 3. In the absence of background, synaptic input to the apical tuft was surprisingly effective in eliciting somatic firing when compared with input to apical oblique branches. This result obtained even when the tuft membrane was the least excitable in the dendritic tree. 4. The special efficacy of tuft input arose because its electrotonic characteristics favour development of a sustained depolarization which charged the apex of the apical trunk to its firing threshold; once initiated in the distal trunk, firing propagated inward to the soma. This mechanism did not depend upon the presence of depolarizing channels in tuft membrane, but did require an excitable apical trunk. 5. Rather than disconnect the tuft, background synaptic conductance enhanced the efficacy advantage enjoyed by input arriving there. This counterintuitive result arose because background reduced the subthreshold spread of voltage, and so diminished the ability of the excitation of various individual oblique branches to combine to charge the relatively thick adjacent trunk. In contrast, drive from the depolarized tuft is exerted at a single critical point, the apex of the distal trunk, and so was relatively undiminished by the background. Further, once initiation at the apex occurred, background had little effect on inward propagation along the trunk. 6. We conclude that synaptic input to the apical tuft of layer 5 cells may be unexpectedly effective in triggering cell firing in vivo. The advantage in efficacy was not dependent upon the characteristics of tuft membrane excitability, but rather stemmed from the geometry of the tuft and its junction with the distal apical trunk. The efficacy of tuft input was, however, critically dependent upon inward propagation, suggesting that modulation of membrane currents which affect propagation in the apical trunk might sensitively control the efficacy of tuft input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11579167      PMCID: PMC2278846          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  64 in total

1.  Site independence of EPSP time course is mediated by dendritic I(h) in neocortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  S R Williams; G J Stuart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Functional profile of the giant metacerebral neuron of Helix aspersa: temporal and spatial dynamics of electrical activity in situ.

Authors:  S Antic; J P Wuskell; L Loew; D Zecevic
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Laminar origins and terminations of cortical connections of the occipital lobe in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  K S Rockland; D N Pandya
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-12-21       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Contributions of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in the proximal versus distal dendrites to synaptic integration in prefrontal cortical neurons.

Authors:  J K Seamans; N A Gorelova; C R Yang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Ca2+ buffering and action potential-evoked Ca2+ signaling in dendrites of pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  F Helmchen; K Imoto; B Sakmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Sodium channels in dendrites of rat cortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  J R Huguenard; O P Hamill; D A Prince
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: insights into central nervous system function.

Authors:  R R Llinás
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex.

Authors:  D A McCormick; B W Connors; J W Lighthall; D A Prince
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Ca2+ accumulations in dendrites of neocortical pyramidal neurons: an apical band and evidence for two functional compartments.

Authors:  R Yuste; M J Gutnick; D Saar; K R Delaney; D W Tank
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Maturation of layer 5 neocortical pyramidal neurons: amplifying salient layer 1 and layer 4 inputs by Ca2+ action potentials in adult rat tuft dendrites.

Authors:  J J Zhu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  16 in total

1.  Temporal binding via cortical coincidence detection of specific and nonspecific thalamocortical inputs: a voltage-dependent dye-imaging study in mouse brain slices.

Authors:  Rodolfo R Llinas; Elena Leznik; Francisco J Urbano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Action potentials in basal and oblique dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Srdjan D Antic
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A fast-conducting, stochastic integrative mode for neocortical neurons in vivo.

Authors:  Michael Rudolph; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Where is the spike generator of the cochlear nerve? Voltage-gated sodium channels in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Waheeda A Hossain; Srdjan D Antic; Yang Yang; Matthew N Rasband; D Kent Morest
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dendritic voltage-gated K+ conductance gradient in pyramidal neurones of neocortical layer 5B from rats.

Authors:  Andreas T Schaefer; Moritz Helmstaedter; Arno C Schmitt; Dan Bar-Yehuda; Mara Almog; Hana Ben-Porat; Bert Sakmann; Alon Korngreen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Dendritic properties of turtle pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Matthew E Larkum; Shigeo Watanabe; Nechama Lasser-Ross; Paul Rhodes; William N Ross
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Chronic stress alters neural activity in medial prefrontal cortex during retrieval of extinction.

Authors:  A A Wilber; A G Walker; C J Southwood; M R Farrell; G L Lin; G V Rebec; C L Wellman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Signaling of layer 1 and whisker-evoked Ca2+ and Na+ action potentials in distal and terminal dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Matthew E Larkum; J Julius Zhu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Anatomical, physiological and molecular properties of Martinotti cells in the somatosensory cortex of the juvenile rat.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Maria Toledo-Rodriguez; Anirudh Gupta; Caizhi Wu; Gilad Silberberg; Junyi Luo; Henry Markram
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity as the origin of the formation of clustered synaptic efficacy engrams.

Authors:  Nicolangelo Libero Iannella; Thomas Launey; Shigeru Tanaka
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.