Literature DB >> 11578472

Neurotoxicity of cisplatin and taxol.

E. Warner1.   

Abstract

Since the discovery of the activity of cisplatin in ovarian cancer approximately 15 years ago, there has been little progress in improving survival for patients with this disease. Thus there has been great enthusiasm in the gynecologic oncology community over the results of GOG111, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study randomizing suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer patients to cisplatin with either cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel (TaxolR). To date, a median survival increase of 13 months has been seen in patients on the taxol-containing arm (ref. 1; W.P. McGuire, personal communication). Although a confirmatory study is about to be implemented by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC), the GOG results are encouraging enough that the majority of ovarian cancer protocols developed over the next decade will probably incorporate some combination of cisplatin and taxol. Since neurotoxicity is now the dose-limiting toxicity of each of these agents, the potential for synergistic toxicity is of major concern, particularly with the tendency for recent protocols to investigate higher doses of both cisplatin and taxol than those used in the GOG study, which were 75 mg m-2 and 135 mg m-2 respectively. This paper will review the clinical manifestations and pathogenesis of the neurotoxicity of cisplatin and taxol as single agents, as well as in combination. The discussion will include several promising compounds which appear to prevent or diminish this sometimes severely disabling neurotoxicity.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 11578472     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1995.05030161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

1.  Peripheral neuropathy due to paclitaxel: study of the temporal relationships between the therapeutic schedule and the clinical quantitative score (QST) and comparison with neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Caraceni Augusto; Miccoli Pietro; Martini Cinzia; Curzi Sergio; Cresta Sara; Gianni Luca; Vidmer Scaioli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: underreported and underappreciated.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2006-08

3.  Chemotherapy-associated neurotoxicity: an important side effect-impacting on quality, rather than quantity, of life.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Clinical and preclinical modulation of chemotherapy-induced toxicity in patients with cancer.

Authors:  K Hoekman; W J van der Vijgh; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Phase I study of paclitaxel (taxol) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with unresectable malignancy.

Authors:  A I Einzig; P H Wiernik; S Wadler; J Kaplan; L T Benson; L Tentoramano; V Tan
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Acetyl-L-carnitine for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a short review.

Authors:  Domenico De Grandis
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Integrating constitutive gene expression and chemoactivity: mining the NCI60 anticancer screen.

Authors:  David G Covell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.