Literature DB >> 11576887

Role of bioimpedance spectroscopy in assessment of body water compartments in hemodialysis patients.

P L Cox-Reijven1, J P Kooman, P B Soeters, F M van der Sande, K M Leunissen.   

Abstract

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) has been advocated as a tool to assess fluid status in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, uncertainty remains about the reliability of BIS in patients with abnormalities in fluid status. Aims of the study are to assess the agreement between total-body water (TBW) and extracellular volume (ECW) measured by BIS and tracer dilution (deuterium oxide [D(2)O] and sodium bromide [NaBr]), the influence of the relative magnitude of water compartments (expressed as TBW(D(2)O) and ECW(NaBr):body weight) on the agreement between BIS and tracer dilution, and the ability of BIS to predict acute changes in fluid status. BIS and tracer dilution techniques were performed in 17 HD patients before a dialysis session. Moreover, the relation between BIS and gravimetric weight changes was assessed during both isolated ultrafiltration and HD. Correlation coefficients between TBW and ECW measured by BIS and tracer dilution were r = 0.71 and r = 0.71, respectively. Mean differences (tracer-BIS) were 6.9 L (limits of agreement, -1.5 to 21.6 L) for TBW and 2.3 L (limits of agreement, -1.7 to 9.7 L) for ECW. There was a significant relationship between the relative magnitude of TBW and ECW compartments and disagreement between BIS and tracer dilution (r = 0.65 and r = 0.77; P < 0.05). During both isolated ultrafiltration and HD, there was a significant relation between gravimetric changes and change in ECW(BIS) (r = 0.83 and r = 0.76; P < 0.05), but not with change in TBW(BIS). In conclusion, agreement between BIS and tracer dilution techniques in the assessment of TBW and ECW in HD patients is unsatisfactory. The discrepancy between BIS and dilution techniques is related to the relative magnitude of body water compartments. Nevertheless, BIS adequately predicted acute changes in ECW during isolated ultrafiltration and HD, in contrast to changes in TBW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11576887     DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.27703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  7 in total

1.  Body composition monitor measurement technique for the detection of volume status in peritoneal dialysis patients: the effect of abdominal fullness.

Authors:  Savas Sipahi; Ender Hur; Saadet Demirtas; Ibrahim Kocayigit; Devrim Bozkurt; Ali Tamer; Huseyin Gunduz; Soner Duman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Revisiting serum creatinine as an indicator of muscle mass and a predictor of mortality among patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Cynthia Delgado; Kirsten L Johansen
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Bioimpedance spectroscopy for the estimation of fat-free mass in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Sara M Vine; Patricia L Painter; Michael A Kuskowski; Carrie P Earthman
Journal:  E Spen Eur E J Clin Nutr Metab       Date:  2011-02-01

4.  Overhydration Is a Strong Predictor of Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients - Independently of Cardiac Failure.

Authors:  Valérie Jotterand Drepper; Lars P Kihm; Florian Kälble; Christian Diekmann; Joerg Seckinger; Claudia Sommerer; Martin Zeier; Vedat Schwenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessment of fluid shifts of body compartments using both bioimpedance analysis and blood volume monitoring.

Authors:  Soo-Jeong Yu; Do-Hyoung Kim; Dong-Jin Oh; Suk-Hee Yu; Eung-Tack Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Estimation of body fluid volume by bioimpedance spectroscopy in patients with hyponatremia.

Authors:  Jae Seok Kim; Jun Young Lee; Hyeoncheol Park; Byoung Geun Han; Seung Ok Choi; Jae Won Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Short daily versus conventional hemodialysis for hypertensive patients: a randomized cross-over study.

Authors:  Deborah L Zimmerman; Marcel Ruzicka; Paul Hebert; Dean Fergusson; Rhian M Touyz; Kevin D Burns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.