Literature DB >> 11576787

Evaluation of an automated system for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci.

P A d'Azevedo1, C A Dias, A L Gonçalves, F Rowe, L M Teixeira.   

Abstract

The performance of a new version of an automated system panel, the Positive Combo Panel Type 11 of MicroScan WalkAway 96 (WA96; Dade Behring) was evaluated and compared to that of reference methods for the identification and for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the different enterococcal species. A total of 376 enterococcal isolates were tested. The MicroScan WA96 correctly identified 99.6% (266/267), 78.3% (18/23) and 68.6% (59/86) of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium and species other than E. faecalis and E. faecium, respectively. Although low probability of accurate identification was obtained for 37 (9.8%) strains, the system indicated that supplementary tests were necessary for precise identification of 8 (9.3%) among the 86 strains included in the non-faecalis/non-faecium group and of 3 (13.0%) among the E. faecium isolates. In comparison to the agar screening method, the percentage of agreement for detection of resistance markers by the automated system was 90.2% (37/41) for ampicillin, 90.6% (48/53) for high-level resistance to streptomycin (HLRS), 96.4% (80/83) for high-level resistance to gentamicin (HLRG), and 100% (14/14) for vancomycin. The results indicate that the MicroScan WA96 performed well for the identification of E. faecalis and typical E. faecium isolates, and for the detection of resistance to vancomycin and HLRG. However, the system still needs further improvement in order to provide reliable results for the characterization of the other enterococcal species, including atypical variants of E. faecium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11576787     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(01)00272-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of microscan broth microdilution, synergy quad plate agar dilution, and disk diffusion screening methods for detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococcus species.

Authors:  David R Murdoch; Stanley Mirrett; Lizzie J Harrell; Susan M Donabedian; Marcus J Zervos; L Barth Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid universal identification of bacterial pathogens from clinical cultures by using a novel sloppy molecular beacon melting temperature signature technique.

Authors:  Soumitesh Chakravorty; Bola Aladegbami; Michele Burday; Michael Levi; Salvatore A E Marras; Darshini Shah; Hiyam H El-Hajj; Fred Russell Kramer; David Alland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparison of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis Strains isolated from water and clinical samples: antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic relationships.

Authors:  Gonzalo Castillo-Rojas; Marisa Mazari-Hiríart; Sergio Ponce de León; Rosa I Amieva-Fernández; Raúl A Agis-Juárez; Johannes Huebner; Yolanda López-Vidal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.