Literature DB >> 11576468

The neutralization of interferons by antibody. II. Neutralizing antibody unitage and its relationship to bioassay sensitivity: the tenfold reduction unit.

S E Grossberg1, Y Kawade, M Kohase, J P Klein.   

Abstract

The importance of establishing a common method of reporting neutralizing antibody levels is emphasized by the fact that patients injected repeatedly with a human interferon (HuIFN) may develop such antibodies that can abrogate the beneficial effects of the treatment. The earlier experimental and theoretical constructs of Kawade led to certain recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO) concerning the methodology of neutralization tests and how to report the resultant data. A WHO international collaborative study on two human sera with antibodies against HuIFN-alpha and HuIFN-beta provided the opportunity not only to test the theoretical concepts concerning the neutralization reaction with data obtained in different bioassay systems in different laboratories but also to obtain enough data points for statistical evaluation with bioassays having a great range of sensitivity to IFN. The analyses substantiate and extend the original conclusions of Kawade that the neutralization follows the reaction mode of low-affinity antibody, in accord with the constant proportion hypothesis by which antibody reduces IFN activity in a set ratio of added/residual biologically active IFN, a consequence of the low molar concentration of free IFN at the neutralization end point. The present results support the recommendation that the preferred way to state the index of neutralization of antibodies is a titer (t), calculated by the formula t = f(n - 1)/9, where f is the reciprocal of the antibody dilution achieving the end point, and n is the IFN concentration measured in that day's titration. The tenfold reduction unit (TRU) of neutralization is proposed for use in expressing the quantity, or unitage, of IFN neutralizing antibody. The utility of its application is explained. The use of the index of neutralization described and the proposed derivative term of antibody unitage, TRU, should help make the results from different laboratories employing different bioassay systems more readily comparable and interpretable, provided the bioassays are sufficiently sensitive to IFN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11576468     DOI: 10.1089/107999001753124471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res        ISSN: 1079-9907            Impact factor:   2.607


  17 in total

1.  Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-Beta.

Authors:  Per Soelberg Sorensen
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.570

2.  Escalating immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Peter Rieckmann; Anthony Traboulsee; Virginia Devonshire; Joel Oger
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.570

3.  Predictors of long-term clinical response to interferon beta therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Valentina Tomassini; Andrea Paolillo; Pierluigi Russo; Elisabetta Giugni; Luca Prosperini; Claudio Gasperini; Guido Antonelli; Stefano Bastianello; Carlo Pozzilli
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Comparison of three PCR assays for the evaluation of interferon-beta biological activity in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Francesca Gilli; Fabiana Marnetto; Guglielmo Stefanuto; Valentina Rinaldi; Federica Farinazzo; Simona Malucchi; Marco Capobianco; Marzia Caldano; Arianna Sala; Antonio Bertolotto
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2004

5.  One-year evaluation of factors affecting the biological activity of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Simona Malucchi; Francesca Gilli; Marzia Caldano; Arianna Sala; Marco Capobianco; Alessia di Sapio; Letizia Granieri; Antonio Bertolotto
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Biological activity of interferon betas in patients with multiple sclerosis is affected by treatment regimen and neutralising antibodies.

Authors:  A Bertolotto; A Sala; S Malucchi; F Marnetto; M Caldano; A Di Sapio; M Capobianco; F Gilli
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 7.  Neutralising antibodies to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis : expert panel report.

Authors:  Hans-P Hartung; Chris Polman; Antonio Bertolotto; Florian Deisenhammer; Gavin Giovannoni; Eva Havrdova; Bernhard Hemmer; Jan Hillert; Ludwig Kappos; Bernd Kieseier; Joep Killestein; Christophe Malcus; Manuel Comabella; Andrew Pachner; Huub Schellekens; Finn Sellebjerg; Krysztof Selmaj; Per Soelberg Sorensen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Quantification of the neutralization of cytokine biological activity by antibody: the ten-fold reduction bioassay of interleukin-6 as growth factor.

Authors:  Sidney E Grossberg; Monika Casey; Leslie D Grossberg
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.607

9.  Use of a standardized MxA protein measurement-based assay for validation of assays for the assessment of neutralizing antibodies against interferon-β.

Authors:  Meenu Wadhwa; Meena Subramanyam; Susan Goelz; Jaya Goyal; Vijay Jethwa; Wendy Jones; James G Files; Daniel Kramer; Chris Bird; Paula Dilger; Michael Tovey; Christophe Lallemand; Robin Thorpe
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.607

10.  Neutralizing antibodies explain the poor clinical response to interferon beta in a small proportion of patients with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Emilia Sbardella; Valentina Tomassini; Claudio Gasperini; Francesca Bellomi; Luca Ausili Cefaro; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Guido Antonelli; Carlo Pozzilli
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.