Literature DB >> 11576433

The monarch butterfly controversy: scientific interpretations of a phenomenon.

A M Shelton1, M K Sears.   

Abstract

The future development and use of agricultural biotechnology has been challenged by two preliminary studies indicating potential risk to monarch butterfly populations by pollen from corn engineered to express proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Likewise, these studies have also challenged the way in which science should be performed, published in scientific journals and communicated to the public at large. Herein, we provide a history of the monarch controversy to date. We believe a retrospective view may be useful for providing insights into the proper roles and responsibilities of scientists, the media and public agencies and the consequences when they go awry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11576433     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01118.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  4 in total

1.  When bad science makes good headlines: Bt maize and regulatory bans.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Morven A McLean; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Genetically modified plants: public and scientific perceptions.

Authors:  Smita Rastogi Verma
Journal:  ISRN Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-07

Review 3.  Potential Risk of Pollen from Genetically Modified MON 810 Maize Containing Cry1Ab Toxin to Protected Lepidopteran Larvae in the Pannonian Biogeographical Region-A Retrospective View.

Authors:  Béla Darvas; Gergő Gyurcsó; Eszter Takács; András Székács
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  The application of GMOs in agriculture and in food production for a better nutrition: two different scientific points of view.

Authors:  M Buiatti; P Christou; G Pastore
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.523

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.