Literature DB >> 11575418

Comparison of coagulation and blood loss during anaesthesia with inhaled isoflurane or intravenous propofol.

N L Law1, K F Ng, M G Irwin, J S Man.   

Abstract

Propofol has been reported to affect blood coagulation. This prospective, randomized study compared coagulation and blood loss during anaesthetic maintenance with target-controlled intravenous propofol infusion vs. inhaled isoflurane. Thirty-eight ASA I-III patients undergoing head and neck surgery were allocated randomly to receive either inhaled isoflurane at end-tidal concentration 1-1.5% (group I, n=20) or target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol at target concentration 2-5 microg ml(-1) (group P, n=18). Thrombelastography on recalcified whole blood was performed pre-induction, and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 min post-induction and 30 min after anaesthesia in both groups. Blood loss was estimated from weighing swabs and the volume in suction bottles. Induced hypotension was not used, and perioperative body temperature was similar between groups. There were no significant differences in thrombelastographic coagulation (R-time, K-time, maximum amplitude and angle) or fibrinolytic variables (lysis index at 30 and 60 min) at all times between groups. Total blood loss was also not significantly different (median group I: 350 ml, range 20-1200 ml; group P: 200 ml, range 50-800 ml). Shortening of R-time and widening of angle developed over time in both groups (P<0.05 groups I and P, repeated measures ANOVA). We conclude that maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol TCI at 2-5 microg ml(-1) does not cause detectable coagulation changes on thrombelastography nor increase surgical blood loss when compared to inhaled isoflurane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11575418     DOI: 10.1093/bja/86.1.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  7 in total

1.  Transcriptomic response of brain tissue to focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption depends strongly on anesthesia.

Authors:  Alexander S Mathew; Catherine M Gorick; E Andrew Thim; William J Garrison; Alexander L Klibanov; G Wilson Miller; Natasha D Sheybani; Richard J Price
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2020-11-24

2.  Intraoperative Blood Loss during Induced Abortion: A Comparison of Anesthetics.

Authors:  Camille A Clare; Gabrielle E Hatton; Neela Shrestha; Michael Girshin; Andre Broumas; Danielle Carmel; Mario A Inchiosa
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-02

3.  Anaesthetic considerations for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jae Won Kim; Tae Woo Kim; Keon Hee Ryu; Sun Gyoo Park; Chang Young Jeong; Dong Ho Park
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 4.  Use of Thromboelastography and Rotational Thromboelastometry in Otolaryngology: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mathew K Marsee; Faisal S Shariff; Grant Wiarda; Patrick J Watson; Ali H Sualeh; Toby J Brenner; Max L McCoy; Hamid D Al-Fadhl; Alexander J Jones; Patrick K Davis; David Zimmer; Craig Folsom
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation assessment in healthy dogs during the perianesthetic period.

Authors:  Wen H Wang; Alex M Lynch; Julie A Balko; Daniel J Duffy; James B Robertson; Lysa P Posner
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  The Role of Anesthetic Selection in Perioperative Bleeding.

Authors:  Koichi Yuki; James A DiNardo; Sophia Koutsogiannaki
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Volatile anesthetics, not intravenous anesthetic propofol bind to and attenuate the activation of platelet receptor integrin αIIbβ3.

Authors:  Koichi Yuki; Weiming Bu; Motomu Shimaoka; Roderic Eckenhoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.