Literature DB >> 11575171

Are biomarkers a useful aid in smoking cessation? A review and analysis of the literature.

J B McClure1.   

Abstract

Healthcare providers' ability to motivate people to try to quit smoking or to remain abstinent is limited. Even with our best treatments, most smokers relapse within 1 year. Therefore it is important that we constantly strive to develop and test new, effective smoking interventions. Providing feedback on one's biomarkers (e.g., biological indices of smoking-related harm, harm exposure, or genetic susceptibility to disease) have been suggested as potentially useful for increasing smokers' motivation or ability to quit smoking. In fact, variations of this strategy are commonly incorporated into behavioral smoking-cessation interventions, but little empirical evidence has specifically addressed whether this approach is effective. In this article, the author reviews the theoretical rationale and empirical evidence regarding this practice. Although the preliminary evidence is promising, more research is needed to determine the efficacy of using biomarkers and the limits of the strategy's effectiveness. Future investigations should address these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11575171     DOI: 10.1080/08964280109595770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Med        ISSN: 0896-4289            Impact factor:   3.104


  15 in total

1.  Accuracy and utility of an epigenetic biomarker for smoking in populations with varying rates of false self-report.

Authors:  Allan M Andersen; Robert A Philibert; Fredrick X Gibbons; Ronald L Simons; Jeffrey Long
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.568

Review 2.  When does personalized feedback make a difference? A narrative review of recent findings and their implications for promoting better diabetes self-care.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Feasibility of detection and intervention for alcohol-related liver disease in the community: the Alcohol and Liver Disease Detection study (ALDDeS).

Authors:  Nick Sheron; Michael Moore; Wendy O'Brien; Scott Harris; Paul Roderick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.

Authors:  D H Lea; K A Kaphingst; D Bowen; I Lipkus; D W Hadley
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Effects of an office-based carotid ultrasound screening intervention.

Authors:  Heather M Johnson; Terry L Turke; Mark Grossklaus; Tara Dall; Sanford Carimi; Laura M Koenig; Susan E Aeschlimann; Claudia E Korcarz; James H Stein
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Carole Clair; Yolanda Mueller; Jonathan Livingstone-Banks; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Yves Camain; Jacques Cornuz; Myriam Rège-Walther; Kevin Selby; Raphaël Bize
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

7.  Immediate and short-term impact of a brief motivational smoking intervention using a biomedical risk assessment: the Get PHIT trial.

Authors:  Jennifer B McClure; Evette Ludman; Lou Grothaus; Chester Pabiniak; Julie Richards; Amy Mohelnitzky
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 8.  Effectiveness of biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raphaël Bize; Bernard Burnand; Yolanda Mueller; Jacques Cornuz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Effect on smoking quit rate of telling patients their lung age: the Step2quit randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gary Parkes; Trisha Greenhalgh; Mark Griffin; Richard Dent
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-06

10.  Impact of a brief motivational smoking cessation intervention the Get PHIT randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer B McClure; Evette J Ludman; Louis Grothaus; Chester Pabiniak; Julie Richards
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.