Literature DB >> 11575136

[Analysis of German language consumer information brochures on screening for colorectal cancer].

A Steckelberg1, A Balgenorth, I Mühlhauser.   

Abstract

A total of 17 consumer brochures that deal with the screening for colorectal cancer were analysed by two independently working researchers. The aim was to assess the quality of the information as a basis for evidence-based informed decision making using pre-defined evaluation criteria. No brochures fulfilled the necessary criteria. In most brochures there was a lack of transparency of the information process. No data was provided for estimating individual risks of colorectal cancer morbidity or mortality. With respect to the efficacy of screening no data was provided about relative or absolute risk reductions, number needed to screen, number needed to harm, predictive rates and false positive rates. In conclusion, presently available information brochures in Germany do not allow informed decision-making by consumers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11575136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  5 in total

1.  Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anke Steckelberg; Christian Hülfenhaus; Burkhard Haastert; Ingrid Mühlhauser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-02

Review 2.  Development of a comprehensive list of criteria for evaluating consumer education materials on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Maren Dreier; Birgit Borutta; Gabriele Seidel; Inga Kreusel; Jürgen Töppich; Eva M Bitzer; Marie-Luise Dierks; Ulla Walter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Communicating the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening needed for an informed choice: a systematic evaluation of leaflets and booklets.

Authors:  Maren Dreier; Birgit Borutta; Gabriele Seidel; Inga Münch; Silke Kramer; Jürgen Töppich; Marie-Luise Dierks; Ulla Walter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Can facts trump unconditional trust? Evidence-based information halves the influence of physicians' non-evidence-based cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Gert G Wagner; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analysis of consumer information brochures on osteoporosis prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Gabriele Meyer; Anke Steckelberg; Ingrid Mühlhauser
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2007-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.