J H Rimmer1, B B Riley, S S Rubin. 1. Center on Health Promotion Research for Persons with Disabilities, University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Disability and Human Development, (M/C 626), 1640 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL 60608-6904, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Assess the psychometric properties of the Physical Activity and Disability Survey (PADS), a new physical activity measure for persons with disabilities and chronic health conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and pre-post designs were employed. SETTING: A Midwestern university fitness center. SUBJECTS: Participants were 103 individuals with disabilities and/or chronic health conditions. MEASURES: The Physical Activity and Disability Survey (PADS), peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), maximum workload (MW), and time to exhaustion (TE) during exercise. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed a four-factor model that generally corresponded to PADS subscales. Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from .67 (Exercise) to .77 (Time Indoors). Test-retest reliability (1-week interval) ranged from .78 (Time Indoors) to .95 (Leisure Time Physical Activity). Interrater reliability ranged from .92 (Household Activities) to .99 (Exercise, Leisure Time Physical Activity, Total Activity). Significant (p < .05) correlations were found between PADS subscales and absolute peak VO2 (Leisure Time Physical Activity, Household Activity, Total Activity), relative peak VO2 (Exercise, Time Indoors), MW (Time Indoors, Household Activity), and TE (Household Activity, Total Activity). Analyses of variance revealed that, unlike controls, health promotion program participants evidenced significant pre-post gains as measured by the Exercise subscale and Total Activity score. CONCLUSIONS: The findings lend support for the reliability and validity of the PADS as a measure of physical activity of groups who are sedentary and disabled.
PURPOSE: Assess the psychometric properties of the Physical Activity and Disability Survey (PADS), a new physical activity measure for persons with disabilities and chronic health conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and pre-post designs were employed. SETTING: A Midwestern university fitness center. SUBJECTS:Participants were 103 individuals with disabilities and/or chronic health conditions. MEASURES: The Physical Activity and Disability Survey (PADS), peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), maximum workload (MW), and time to exhaustion (TE) during exercise. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed a four-factor model that generally corresponded to PADS subscales. Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from .67 (Exercise) to .77 (Time Indoors). Test-retest reliability (1-week interval) ranged from .78 (Time Indoors) to .95 (Leisure Time Physical Activity). Interrater reliability ranged from .92 (Household Activities) to .99 (Exercise, Leisure Time Physical Activity, Total Activity). Significant (p < .05) correlations were found between PADS subscales and absolute peak VO2 (Leisure Time Physical Activity, Household Activity, Total Activity), relative peak VO2 (Exercise, Time Indoors), MW (Time Indoors, Household Activity), and TE (Household Activity, Total Activity). Analyses of variance revealed that, unlike controls, health promotion program participants evidenced significant pre-post gains as measured by the Exercise subscale and Total Activity score. CONCLUSIONS: The findings lend support for the reliability and validity of the PADS as a measure of physical activity of groups who are sedentary and disabled.
Authors: Eboni G Price-Haywood; Jewel Harden-Barrios; Christopher Carr; Laya Reddy; Lydia A Bazzano; Mieke L van Driel Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kate Williams; Anja Frei; Anders Vetsch; Fabienne Dobbels; Milo A Puhan; Katja Rüdell Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Richard A Washburn; Lauren T Ptomey; Anna M Gorczyca; Patricia R Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Robert Lee; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Anja Frei; Kate Williams; Anders Vetsch; Fabienne Dobbels; Laura Jacobs; Katja Rüdell; Milo A Puhan Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Matthew Plow; Shirley M Moore; John P Kirwan; Fredrick Frost; Irene Katzan; Sue Jaeger; Jay Alberts Journal: Trials Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 2.279