J S Meriano1, J Alexis, S Visram-Zaver, M Cruz, R F Casper. 1. Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toronto Centre for Advanced Reproductive Technology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We determined whether oocyte dysmorphisms, especially repetition of specific dysmorphisms from cycle to cycle, had a prognostic impact on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. METHODS: ICSI patients (n = 67) were grouped as follows: group 1 >50% phenotypically dysmorphic oocytes per cohort (cytoplasmic and extra-cytoplasmic dysmorphisms) with no repetition of a specific dysmorphism from cycle one to cycle two (36 cycles and 274 oocytes); group 2 >50% dysmorphic oocytes per cohort and repetition of the same dysmorphism from cycle one to cycle two (32 cycles and 313 oocytes); group 3 (control) <30% dysmorphic oocytes (33 cycles and 378 oocytes). RESULTS: In group 2 (repetitive), 47% of oocytes were observed to have organelle clustering versus 20.5% in group 1 and 17.3% in group 3 (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in fertilization rates, cleavage rates or embryo quality. Embryos derived from normal oocytes were transferred in each group (57, 33 and 72% respectively). The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group 2 (3.1 and 1.7% respectively) were lower (P < 0.01, P = 0.005) than both group 1 (28 and 15% respectively) and group 3 (45.5 and 26.5% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The low implantation rate in group 2, even though 33% of transferred embryos were derived from morphologically normal oocytes, suggests that repetitive organelle clustering may be associated with an underlying adverse factor affecting the entire follicular cohort.
BACKGROUND: We determined whether oocyte dysmorphisms, especially repetition of specific dysmorphisms from cycle to cycle, had a prognostic impact on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. METHODS: ICSI patients (n = 67) were grouped as follows: group 1 >50% phenotypically dysmorphic oocytes per cohort (cytoplasmic and extra-cytoplasmic dysmorphisms) with no repetition of a specific dysmorphism from cycle one to cycle two (36 cycles and 274 oocytes); group 2 >50% dysmorphic oocytes per cohort and repetition of the same dysmorphism from cycle one to cycle two (32 cycles and 313 oocytes); group 3 (control) <30% dysmorphic oocytes (33 cycles and 378 oocytes). RESULTS: In group 2 (repetitive), 47% of oocytes were observed to have organelle clustering versus 20.5% in group 1 and 17.3% in group 3 (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in fertilization rates, cleavage rates or embryo quality. Embryos derived from normal oocytes were transferred in each group (57, 33 and 72% respectively). The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group 2 (3.1 and 1.7% respectively) were lower (P < 0.01, P = 0.005) than both group 1 (28 and 15% respectively) and group 3 (45.5 and 26.5% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The low implantation rate in group 2, even though 33% of transferred embryos were derived from morphologically normal oocytes, suggests that repetitive organelle clustering may be associated with an underlying adverse factor affecting the entire follicular cohort.
Authors: Arnold M Mahesan; Paul T Chang; Ruth Ronn; Anthea B M Paul; Jim Meriano; Robert F Casper Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.357
Authors: Ana Marcia M Cota; Joao Batista A Oliveira; Claudia G Petersen; Ana L Mauri; Fabiana C Massaro; Liliane F I Silva; Andreia Nicoletti; Mario Cavagna; Ricardo L R Baruffi; José G Franco Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.211