Literature DB >> 11573628

Persistent back pain after spinal anaesthesia in the non-obstetric setting: incidence and predisposing factors.

K Schwabe1, H B Hopf.   

Abstract

We determined the incidence of persistent back pain (PBP) after non-obstetrical spinal anaesthesia (SPA) and investigated factors predisposing to such pain in a prospective 1 yr follow-up study in 245 patients undergoing elective general or trauma surgery (218 patients undergoing single SPA, 27 undergoing two to six SPAs). All patients received a first questionnaire 3 months after the last SPA, and those reporting PBP after 3 months were sent a second questionnaire I year after the operation. Variables were PBP before and within 5 days, at 3 months and I year after SPA, patient satisfaction with SPA, patient characteristics and technical data. Statistical analysis was by contingency tables with Fisher's exact test and an unpaired t-test with logistic regression (P < 0.001 after Bonferroni correction was taken as significant). The response rate in patients who had a single SPA was 56% (122/218). Twenty-three of these 122 patients (18.9%) complained of back pain before SPA compared with 12/122 (10.7%, P = 0.0015) within 5 days after SPA. After 3 months, 15/122 patients (12.3%) reported PBP with 14 complaining of PBP before SPA (P < 0.0001), corresponding to an incidence of new PBP of 1/122 (0.8%). Multiple logistic regression revealed that pre-existing back pain was the only variable associated with PBP after 3 months (P < 0.0001). Patient characteristics and technical factors were not associated with PBP. Nine of the 15 patients with PBP after 3 months returned the second questionnaire: four still reported PBP (three of these had suffered from PBP before SPA). Despite PBP after 3 months, 13/15 patients said they would opt for SPA again. The response rate and results in patients who had had multiple SPAs were similiar to those who had had a single SPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11573628     DOI: 10.1093/bja/86.4.535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  7 in total

1.  Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Won Ji Rhee; Chan Jong Chung; Youn Hee Lim; Kyu Han Lee; Seung Cheol Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-21

2.  Spinal anesthesia: how can we improve patient satisfaction?

Authors:  Jong Seok Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-21

3.  Dexamethasone added to local lidocaine for infiltration along the spinal-epidural needle pathway decreases incidence and severity of backache after gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Yi Ren; Guang Xiao Cui
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  The association of anesthetic method with developing back pain after lower extremity operations.

Authors:  Marjan Joudi; Mehdi Fathi; Amin Dalili; Saeed Jahanbakhsh; Amir Merikhi Ardabili; Mohsen Akhondi; Azra Izanloo
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014-11-16

5.  Prevalence and Factors Associated with Back Pain among Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia: An Institutional Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Tadael Gudayu Zeleke; Abraham Tarekegn Mersha; Nigussie Simeneh Endalew; Yonas Admasu Ferede
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2021-01-25

6.  Spinal anesthesia with isobaric tetracaine in patients with previous lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  Soo Hwan Kim; Dong-Hyuk Jeon; Chul Ho Chang; Sung-Jin Lee; Yang-Sik Shin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Incidence of newly developed postoperative low back pain with median versus paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Jung Ha Lee; Dae Hun Yoon; Bong Ha Heo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.