Literature DB >> 11573461

Rural, urban and suburban comparisons of preventive services in family practice clinics.

L G Pol1, J Rouse, S Zyzanski, D Rasmussen, B Crabtree.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have compared health services provided in rural and urban areas, and overall they have found that utilization is lower in rural areas. A significant factor in lower utilization is that rural residents have less access to health services. Much less is known about rural and urban utilization differences once a patient has access to a service provider. This paper focuses on preventive services received when a patient is already in a clinic. Using data from an in-depth qualitative study of 16 family practice clinics in Nebraska, comparisons of physician-specific preventive service rates are made across three geographic categories: rural, urban and suburban. Results from a one-way multivariate analysis of variance show that preventive services rates for nine services examined were as high or higher in rural areas, suggesting that rural health services do not lag for patients with access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11573461     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2001.tb00267.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  3 in total

1.  Rural, suburban, and urban differences in factors that impact physician adherence to clinical preventive service guidelines.

Authors:  Elaine C Khoong; Wesley S Gibbert; Jane M Garbutt; Walton Sumner; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Use of colon cancer testing in rural Colorado primary care practices.

Authors:  Linda Overholser; Linda Zittleman; Allison Kempe; Caroline Bublitz Emsermann; Desiree B Froshaug; Deborah S Main; Rodrigo Araya-Guerra; Maret Felzien; John M Westfall
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Breast cancer screening beliefs by practice location.

Authors:  Lisa M Santora; Martin C Mahoney; Silvana Lawvere; Jessica J Englert; Andrew B Symons; Amy L Mirand
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.