Literature DB >> 11573181

Measurement of the maxilla and zygoma as an aid in installing zygomatic implants.

Y Uchida1, M Goto, T Katsuki, T Akiyoshi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study used maxillary and zygomatic measurements to obtain information for installing zygomatic implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Angular and linear distances between the maxilla and the zygoma were measured in 12 cadavers (n = 22 sides) classified into short and tall groups by height (140 to 159 cm and 160 to 180 cm, respectively).
RESULTS: Based on mean and standard deviation values, the installation angle of zygomatic implants was between 43.8 degrees and 50.6 degrees. The distance between the crest of the maxillary alveolar process near the palate and the jugale (Ju) point of the zygoma was between 44.3 and 54.3 mm. The minimum distance between the most lateral corner of the maxillary sinus and the Ju point was 6.41 mm, and the minimum anteroposterior length of the zygoma was 5.68 mm in the shorter group.
CONCLUSIONS: When the installation angle of zygomatic implants is 43.8 degrees or less, perforation of the maxilla and the zygoma or the infratemporal fossa must be avoided. When the angle is 50.6 degrees or more, perforation of the orbital floor must be avoided. Special attention is needed to ensure osseointegration in shorter patients, because the distance between the most lateral corner of the antrum supporting the zygomatic implant and the Ju point is 10 mm or less. The apex of the implant is 3.75 mm in diameter, and the thickness of the zygoma must be 5.75 mm or more. The threads of the implant must not be exposed from the zygoma in shorter patients. Copyright 2001 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11573181     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2001.26725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  Optical Diagnostics of the Maxillary Sinuses by Digital Diaphanoscopy Technology.

Authors:  Ekaterina O Bryanskaya; Irina N Novikova; Viktor V Dremin; Roman Yu Gneushev; Olga A Bibikova; Andrey V Dunaev; Viacheslav G Artyushenko
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 2.  Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleix Solà Pérez; David Pastorino; Carlos Aparicio; Marta Pegueroles Neyra; Rabia Sannam Khan; Simon Wright; Cemal Ucer
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12

3.  Rehabilitation of posterior maxilla with zygomatic and dental implant after tumor resection: a case report.

Authors:  Faysal Ugurlu; Coskun Yıldız; B C Sener; Atilla Sertgoz
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-02-28

4.  Prospective signs of cleidocranial dysplasia in Cebpb deficiency.

Authors:  Boyen Huang; Katsu Takahashi; Ernest A Jennings; Pongthorn Pumtang-On; Honoka Kiso; Yumiko Togo; Kazuyuki Saito; Manabu Sugai; Shizuo Akira; Akira Shimizu; Kazuhisa Bessho
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 8.410

5.  An Anatomical Study of Maxillary-Zygomatic Complex Using Three-Dimensional Computerized Tomography-Based Zygomatic Implantation.

Authors:  Xiangliang Xu; Shijie Zhao; Hui Liu; Zhipeng Sun; Jianwei Wang; Weiguang Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Julio Tobar-Reyes; Luis Andueza-Castro; Antonio Jiménez-Silva; Roger Bustamante-Plaza; Juan Carvajal-Herrera
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-05-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.