Literature DB >> 11573046

Long-term outcome of antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

W L Hofstetter1, J H Peters, T R DeMeester, J A Hagen, S R DeMeester, P F Crookes, P Tsai, F Banki, C G Bremner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term outcome of antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus is increasing, and its treatment is problematic. Antireflux surgery has the potential to stop reflux and induce a quiescent mucosa. Its long-term outcome, however, has recently been challenged with reports of poor control of reflux and the inability to prevent progression to cancer.
METHODS: The outcome of antireflux surgery was studied in 97 patients with Barrett's esophagus. Follow-up was complete in 88% (85/97) at a median of 5 years. Fifty-nine had long-segment and 26 short-segment Barrett's. Patients with intestinal metaplasia of the cardia were excluded. Fifty patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure, 20 a transthoracic procedure, and 3 abdominal Nissen operations. Nine had a Collis-Belsey procedure and three had other partial wraps. Outcome measures included relief of reflux symptoms (all), patients' perception of the result (all), upper endoscopy and histology (n = 79), and postoperative 24-hour pH monitoring (n = 21).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 5 years, reflux symptoms were absent in 67 of 85 patients (79%). Eighteen (20%) developed recurrent symptoms; four had returned to taking daily acid-suppression medication. Seven patients underwent a secondary repair and were asymptomatic, increasing the eventual successful outcome to 87%. Recurrent symptoms were most common in patients undergoing Collis-Belsey (33%) and laparoscopic Nissen (26%) procedures and least common after a transthoracic Nissen operation (5%). The results of postoperative 24-hour pH monitoring were normal in 17 of 21 (81%). Recurrent hiatal hernias were detected in 17 of 79 patients studied; 6 were asymptomatic. Seventy-seven percent of the patients considered themselves cured, 22% considered their condition to be improved, and 97% were satisfied. Low-grade dysplasia regressed to nondysplastic Barrett's in 7 of 16 (44%), and intestinal metaplasia regressed to cardiac mucosa in 9 of 63 (14%). Low-grade dysplasia developed in 4 of 63 (6%) patients. No patient developed high-grade dysplasia or cancer in 410 patient-years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: After antireflux surgery, most patients with Barrett's enjoy long-lasting relief of reflux symptoms, and nearly all patients consider themselves cured or improved. Mild symptoms recur in one fifth. Importantly, dysplasia regressed in nearly half of the patients in whom it was present before surgery, intestinal metaplasia disappeared in 14% of patients, and high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma were prevented in all.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11573046      PMCID: PMC1422076          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  24 in total

1.  Conservative treatment versus antireflux surgery in Barrett's oesophagus: long-term results of a prospective study.

Authors:  A Ortiz; L F Martinez de Haro; P Parrilla; G Morales; J Molina; J Bermejo; R Liron; J Aguilar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Barrett's esophagus: should we brush off this ballooning problem?

Authors:  S J Spechler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Increasing incidence of Barrett's oesophagus: education, enthusiasm, or epidemiology?

Authors:  A T Prach; T A MacDonald; D A Hopwood; D A Johnston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  D Katz; R Rothstein; A Schned; J Dunn; K Seaver; D Antonioli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Regression of Barrett's esophagus by laser ablation in an anacid environment.

Authors:  R E Sampliner; L J Hixson; M B Fennerty; H S Garewal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Columnar mucosa and intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus: fifty years of controversy.

Authors:  S R DeMeester; T R DeMeester
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Barretts's esophagus: does an antireflux procedure reduce the need for endoscopic surveillance?

Authors:  M L McDonald; V F Trastek; M S Allen; C Deschamps; P C Pairolero; P C Pairolero
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Barrett's esophagus. A surgical entity.

Authors:  V A Starnes; R B Adkins; J F Ballinger; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1984-05

9.  Effect of antireflux operation on Barrett's mucosa.

Authors:  W A Williamson; F H Ellis; S P Gibb; D M Shahian; H T Aretz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Successful elimination of reflux symptoms does not insure adequate control of acid reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  D A Katzka; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  50 in total

1.  Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Pascual Parrilla; Luisa F Martínez de Haro; Angeles Ortiz; Vicente Munitiz; Joaquín Molina; Juan Bermejo; Manuel Canteras
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Barrett's esophagus: now what?

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Barrett's esophagus before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for severe obesity.

Authors:  Brandon Andrew; Joshua B Alley; Cristina E Aguilar; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  How should Barrett's ulceration be treated?

Authors:  J H Peters; K K Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of the biliary diversion procedure on carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus surgically induced by duodenoesophageal reflux in rats.

Authors:  Koji Nishijima; Koichi Miwa; Tomoharu Miyashita; Shinichi Kinami; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Takanori Hattori
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; Geoffrey P Kohn; Patrick R Reardon; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: A review of surgical decision making.

Authors:  Maureen Moore; Cheguevara Afaneh; Daniel Benhuri; Caroline Antonacci; Jonathan Abelson; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01-27

10.  Laparoscopic cardial calibration and gastropexy for treatment of patients with reflux esophagitis: pathophysiological basis and result.

Authors:  Italo Braghetto; Owen Korn; Anibal Debandi; Patricio Burdiles; Hector Valladares; Attila Csendes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.