Literature DB >> 11572987

Contribution of individual random mutations to genotype-by-environment interactions in Escherichia coli.

S K Remold1, R E Lenski.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown genotype-by-environment (GxE) interactions for traits related to organismal fitness. However, the genetic architecture of the interaction is usually unknown because these studies used genotypes that differ from one another by many unknown mutations. These mutations were also present as standing variation in populations and hence had been subject to prior selection. Based on such studies, it is therefore impossible to say what fraction of new, random mutations contributes to GxE interactions. In this study, we measured the fitness in four environments of 26 genotypes of Escherichia coli, each containing a single random insertion mutation. Fitness was measured relative to their common progenitor, which had evolved on glucose at 37 degrees C for the preceding 10,000 generations. The four assay environments differed in limiting resource and temperature (glucose, 28 degrees C; maltose, 28 degrees C; glucose, 37 degrees C; and maltose, 37 degrees C). A highly significant interaction between mutation and resource was found. In contrast, there was no interaction involving temperature. The resource interaction reflected much higher among mutation variation for fitness in maltose than in glucose. At least 11 mutations (42%) contributed to this GxE interaction through their differential fitness effects across resources. Beneficial mutations are generally thought to be rare but, surprisingly, at least three mutations (12%) significantly improved fitness in maltose, a resource novel to the progenitor. More generally, our findings demonstrate that GxE interactions can be quite common, even for genotypes that differ by only one mutation and in environments differing by only a single factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572987      PMCID: PMC58739          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.201140198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

Review 1.  Canalization in evolutionary genetics: a stabilizing theory?

Authors:  G Gibson; G Wagner
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 2.  Estimation of spontaneous genome-wide mutation rate parameters: whither beneficial mutations?

Authors:  T Bataillon
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The evolution of genetic canalization under fluctuating selection.

Authors:  T J Kawecki
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation.

Authors:  J H Gillespie; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10.

Authors:  N Kleckner; J Bender; S Gottesman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution.

Authors:  S L Rutherford; S Lindquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. IV. Targets of selection and the specificity of adaptation.

Authors:  M Travisano; R E Lenski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria.

Authors:  S F Elena; R E Lenski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Epistatic effects of promoter and repressor functions of the Tn10 tetracycline-resistance operon of the fitness of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R E Lenski; V Souza; L P Duong; Q G Phan; T N Nguyen; K P Bertrand
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Functional effects of PGI allozymes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D E Dykhuizen; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  25 in total

1.  Are bigger flies always better: the role of genes and environment.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Measuring selection coefficients below 10(-3): method, questions, and prospects.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Tim F Cooper; Santiago F Elena; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Breaking evolutionary constraint with a tradeoff ratchet.

Authors:  Marjon G J de Vos; Alexandre Dawid; Vanda Sunderlikova; Sander J Tans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Thoughts Toward a Theory of Natural Selection: The Importance of Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Daniel Dykhuizen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  The population genetic theory of hidden variation and genetic robustness.

Authors:  Joachim Hermisson; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Intergenomic epistasis for fitness: within-population interactions between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Damian K Dowling; Urban Friberg; Frank Hailer; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Barrick; Dong Su Yu; Sung Ho Yoon; Haeyoung Jeong; Tae Kwang Oh; Dominique Schneider; Richard E Lenski; Jihyun F Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  SIZE DOESN'T MATTER: MICROBIAL SELECTION EXPERIMENTS ADDRESS ECOLOGICAL PHENOMENA.

Authors:  Michael Feldgarden; Daniel M Stoebel; Dustin Brisson; Daniel E Dykhuizen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Cost of adaptation and fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  Thomas Bataillon; Tianyi Zhang; Rees Kassen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.