Literature DB >> 11572615

Age-related changes in fear, sociality and pecking behaviours in two strains of laying hen.

P M Hocking1, C E Channing, D Waddington, R B Jones.   

Abstract

1. Two lines of commercial hybrid layers (Tetra and ISA Brown) were reared from hatch to 30 weeks of age in groups of 8. The objectives of the experiment were to evaluate the significance of the different selection practices involved in the development of the lines and to assess the potential association between selected behavioural states and the potential for feather damage and cannibalism. 2. Behavioural tests related to fear (tonic immobility, novel object, open field), sociality (runway, proximity in the home pen) and pecking (feather bunch and focal observations of inter-bird and environmental pecking) were conducted at 0 to 2, 5 to 7, 12 to 14, 19 to 21 and 29 to 31 weeks of age. Scan sampling of general behaviour was also conducted at these ages. 3. Underlying sociality was greater in Tetras than in ISA Brown hens. 4. There were no apparent overall strain differences in fearfulness although ISA Brown hens showed significantly longer tonic immobility fear reactions than Tetras at 31 weeks of age. 5. ISA Brown hens gave and received more gentle pecks than Tetra hens whereas preening was commoner among Tetras. There were no strain differences in the number of pecks at litter or food. 6. As birds aged they showed less avoidance of novel objects and Tetras, though not ISA Browns, showed progressively shorter tonic immobility responses. Birds of both strains spent less time resting, more foraging (pecking and scratching) and pecked more at the feather bunch at older ages. 7. Measures taken in the TI, open field, runway (social affiliation) and feather bunch tests were stable over time whereas focal observations of pecking at hens and the environment were not. 8. Factor Analysis showed that 3 factors defined by the novel object test, environmental pecking and pecking ata feather bunch explained most of the variation in the correlation matrix between summary measures for the 8 behavioural traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572615     DOI: 10.1080/00071660120070686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  9 in total

1.  Identification of chromosomal locations associated with tail biting and being a victim of tail-biting behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Kaitlin Wilson; Ricardo Zanella; Carlos Ventura; Hanne Lind Johansen; Tore Framstad; Andrew Janczak; Adroaldo J Zanella; Holly Louise Neibergs
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Keel bone damage affects behavioral and physiological responses related to stress and fear in two strains of laying hens.

Authors:  Haidong Wei; Yanru Feng; Susu Ding; Haoyang Nian; Hanlin Yu; Qian Zhao; Jun Bao; Runxiang Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Parents and early life environment affect behavioral development of laying hen chickens.

Authors:  Elske N de Haas; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Bas Kemp; Ton G G Groothuis; T Bas Rodenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of Dark Brooders on Behavior and Fearfulness in Layers.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Diego A Guzman
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Genetic correlations between behavioural responses and performance traits in laying hens.

Authors:  Iwona Rozempolska-Rucińska; Grzegorz Zięba; Lucyna Kibała; Tomasz Próchniak; Marek Łukaszewicz
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  A comparison of fast growing broiler chickens with a slower-growing breed type reared on Higher Welfare commercial farms.

Authors:  Mary Baxter; Anne Richmond; Ursula Lavery; Niamh E O'Connell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Environmental Enrichment as Part of the Improvement of the Welfare of Japanese Quails.

Authors:  Anastasiya Ramankevich; Karolina Wengerska; Kinga Rokicka; Kamil Drabik; Kornel Kasperek; Agnieszka Ziemiańska; Justyna Batkowska
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.231

9.  Early-life microbiota transplantation affects behavioural responses, serotonin and immune characteristics in chicken lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  Jerine A J van der Eijk; T Bas Rodenburg; Hugo de Vries; Joergen B Kjaer; Hauke Smidt; Marc Naguib; Bas Kemp; Aart Lammers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.