Literature DB >> 11572488

Conscious sedation experiences in graduate pediatric dentistry programs.

S Wilson1, K Farrell, A Griffen, D Coury.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conscious sedation is a behavior modification adjunct taught in all postgraduate pediatric dental residency programs. It has been a decade since the last survey was done specifically related to didactic and clinical aspects of conscious sedation in postgraduate pediatric dental programs. The aim of the study was to determine the clinical and didactic experiences associated with conscious sedation in these programs and to compare some of the findings to those collected a decade ago.
METHODS: A 31-item survey similar to that of a decade ago was constructed and sent to all pediatric dentistry program directors of accredited postgraduate and residency programs in the United States. The items covered several didactics including didactic topics, sedative agents, monitoring, and emergency policy among others. A follow-up mailing was done involving those who had not responded 6 weeks following the initial mailing.
RESULTS: Fifty-four of 58 (93%) program directors returned the 31-item survey. The following are highlighted findings. Conscious sedation among residency programs was achieved most commonly with a combination of sedative agents used with N2O. Midazolam was more popular than chloral hydrate. The oral route was the predominant route of administration. More lecture hours were spent on conscious sedation than 10 years ago. The pre-cordial stethoscope, pulse oximeter, and blood pressure cuff were the most commonly used monitors. Sedative agent and anticipated depth of sedation were the factors most often considered in choosing monitors used during the sedation of a patient. The capnograph was being used more frequently than it was 10 years ago. Programs did not report an increase in sedation emergencies but practiced emergency drills more often and had increased numbers of individuals certified in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) or Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS). The percent of the total patient population which required sedation is about 1-20%, with most directors reporting an increase in the numbers of sedations done in the past few years.
CONCLUSIONS: While many factors remained unchanged or slightly modified when compared to the survey done a decade ago, the results of this study suggest that there has been significant changes in several key factors including the most frequently used sedative (i.e., midazolam) and increased preparation in the area of emergency preparedness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  5 in total

1.  Oral Sedation Postdischarge Adverse Events in Pediatric Dental Patients.

Authors:  Annie Huang; Thomas Tanbonliong
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015

2.  Effects of Sedation and/or Sedation/Analgesic Drugs Administered during Central Venous Catheterization on the Level of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Measured by Nasal Cannula in Our PICU.

Authors:  Nagehan Aslan; Dincer Yildizdas; Ozden Ozgur Horoz; Didar Arslan; Yasemin Coban; Yasar Sertdemir
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-08

3.  Comparison of oral and buccal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation: a randomized, cross-over, clinical trial for efficacy, acceptance and safety.

Authors:  Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati; Majid Mehran; Roza Haghgoo; Monireh Tohid-Rahbari; Rahil Ahmadi
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.364

Review 4.  Pediatric advanced life support and sedation of pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  Jongbin Kim
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 5.  Considerations for submucosal midazolam administration in combination with oral and inhaled medications for sedation of pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  Kwangwoo Baek
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.