Literature DB >> 11572359

A level of stimulus representation model for auditory detection and attention.

E R Hafter1, K Saberi.   

Abstract

A model is offered here to address an asymmetry of cueing in signal detection [Hafter et al. (1992)] where the effect of frequency uncertainty on the detection of a randomly chosen tone was ameliorated by cueing with a sequence of its harmonics, but detection of a randomly chosen sequence of harmonics was not improved by cueing with their fundamental. The model proposes that signal detection can be based on various levels of neural representation that, for the case at hand, refer to levels organized either by frequency or by complex pitch. Experiments offered to test the model used three-tone complexes for both cues and signals. These stimuli consisted of either three randomly chosen frequencies or three randomly chosen harmonics (from the set 2 f1 to 7 f1) of a randomly chosen fundamental. Support for the idea of cueing and detection at different levels of representation was found in higher performance with uncued detection of harmonic complexes relative to that found with complexes of unrelated tones and by successful cueing of each type of information with cues created to remove uncertainty about the relevant information. A final comparison suggests independence of performance (presumably of the limiting noise) at each of the putative levels of representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572359     DOI: 10.1121/1.1394220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: an example using chinchilla data.

Authors:  William A Yost; William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Octave effect in auditory attention.

Authors:  Tobias Borra; Huib Versnel; Chantal Kemner; A John van Opstal; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The incongruency advantage for environmental sounds presented in natural auditory scenes.

Authors:  Brian Gygi; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Kameron K Clayton; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Low-level information and high-level perception: the case of speech in noise.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Harmonicity aids hearing in noise.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; River C Grace; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.