Literature DB >> 11571942

Surgeon-patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings.

V R Hentz1, M Stephanides, A Boraldi, R Tessari, R Isani, R Cadossi, R Biscione, L Massari, G C Traina.   

Abstract

Blood-borne viral pathogens are an occupational threat to health care workers (HCWs), particularly those in the operating room. A major risk is posed by accidental penetrating injury, but skin contamination with body fluids from an infected patient, with prolonged intimate cutaneous contact, is a frequent occurrence during surgery, carrying further risk of transdermal infection. We have monitored barrier failure in three surgical settings (microsurgery, orthopedic surgery, general surgery) by means of an electronic surveillance device. A total of 111 surgical procedures were monitored: 67 microsurgeries, 22 orthopedic surgeries, and 22 general surgeries. Of the 278 electronic alarms signaling barrier failure, 44 (15.8%) were associated with glove perforation, 39 of which (88.6%) were not perceived by the operator. In 16 of those, the skin was visibly stained with the patient's blood. Altogether, 76 of the alarms (27.3%) were consequent to contacts caused by soaked gowns/sleeves, and 121 (43.5%) were attributed to hydration of latex porosities; 37 alarms (13.4%) were unexplained false positives. On only one occasion did a surgeon observe blood stains on his hands without a previous alarm; this event was classified as a device failure due to incorrect wiring. Double-gloving offered satisfactory protection against skin contamination during microsurgery but not during orthopedic surgery. The data presented here indicate that electronic monitoring of the surgical barrier enables prompt detection of barrier failure, especially at the level of the gloves, thereby limiting skin contamination with patients' body fluids during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11571942     DOI: 10.1007/bf03215854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  38 in total

1.  Guidelines for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus to health-care and public-safety workers.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  1989-06-23

2.  Do surgical gloves protect staff during electrosurgical procedures?

Authors:  R D Tucker; S Ferguson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Occult surgical glove perforations in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.

Authors:  M S Godin; C J Lavernia; J P Harris
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-08

4.  Risks to surgeons and patients from HIV and hepatitis: guidelines on precautions and management of exposure to blood or body fluids. Joint Working Party of the Hospital Infection Society and the Surgical Infection Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-28

5.  Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures. Cloth compared with latex.

Authors:  R Sanders; P Fortin; E Ross; D Helfet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Occupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus: a comparative analysis of risk.

Authors:  D K Owens; R F Nease
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 7.  Occupational risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in healthcare workers: an overview.

Authors:  D M Bell
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-05-19       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Seroprevalence of blood borne transmissible diseases in trauma orthopaedic surgical patients.

Authors:  L P Sánchez; J M Flynn; M Mayol
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 0.705

9.  Risk of hepatitis C seroconversion after occupational exposures in health care workers. Italian Study Group on Occupational Risk of HIV and Other Bloodborne Infections.

Authors:  V Puro; N Petrosillo; G Ippolito
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.918

10.  The mechanisms and risks of surgical glove perforation.

Authors:  J D Palmer; J W Rickett
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  1 in total

1.  Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Caillot; Philippe Paparel; Eric Arnal; Vincent Schreiber; Eric J Voiglio
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.